부산대학교 도서관

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES.: To review the evidence for interventions to improve dignity for older patients in acute care. BACKGROUND.: High profile cases have highlighted failure to provide dignified care for older people in hospitals. There is good evidence on what older people consider is important for dignified care and abundant recommendations on improving dignity, but it is unclear which interventions are effective. DESIGN.: Narrative systematic review. METHODS.: The Cochrane library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, BNI and HMIC electronic databases were searched for intervention studies of any design aiming to improve inpatientsʼ dignity. The main population of interest was older patients, but the search included all patients. Studies that focused on ‘dignity therapy’ were excluded. RESULTS.: There were no intervention studies found in any country which aimed to improve patient dignity in hospitals which included evaluation of the effect. A narrative overview of papers that described implementing dignity interventions in practice but included no formal evaluation was, therefore, undertaken. Five papers were identified. Three themes were identified: knowing the person; partnership between older people and health care professionals; and, effective communication and clinical leadership. The effect on dignity of improving these is untested. CONCLUSIONS.: There are currently no studies that have tested interventions to improve the dignity of older people (nor anyone else) in hospitals. Further research using well designed trials of interventions is needed. There is also a need to develop and validate outcome measures for interventions to improve dignity. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE.: At present nurses lack robust evidence on how to improve dignity. There is ample evidence on what undermines patientsʼ dignity and there is a need to develop and test interventions designed to improve patient dignity.