부산대학교 도서관

Introduction: The efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) at the extremes of body mass index (BMI) and body weight (BW) remains uncertain, leading to concerns regarding use in these populations across clinical practice guidelines.Methods: This analysis of the COMBINE-AF database pools individual patient-level data from the 4 pivotal RCTs of NOAC vs. warfarin in AF: RE-LY, ROCKET-AF, ARISTOTLE, and ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48. Pts randomized to low-dose NOACs not globally approved for clinical use were excluded. The primary efficacy and safety outcome was stroke/systemic embolic event (S/SEE) and major bleeding, respectively, with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) being a secondary outcome. Outcomes were assessed across BMI and BW using a Cox model stratified by trial, with interaction testing for NOAC vs. warfarin. Restricted cubic splines were used to display the hazard ratio of NOAC vs. warfarin for each outcome across BMI.Results: For 58,464 pts, the median BMI was 28 (25-75 %ile: 25-32) kg/m, with the top 5% (n=2,924) having a BMI ≥ 40 kg/m. For patients randomized to warfarin, the risk of each outcome was lower with increasing BMI (HR per 5 kg/m increase: S/SEE 0.79 [95% CI 0.75-0.84]; major bleeding 0.91 [95% CI 0.87-0.95]; ICH 0.72 [95% CI 0.66-0.80]; p<0.01 for each). There was no significant treatment interaction for NOAC vs. warfarin by BMI for S/SEE (p-interaction = 0.71; Fig 1A), major bleeding (p-interaction = 0.15; Fig 1B), or ICH (p-interaction = 0.84; Fig 1C), such that there was consistent reduction in S/SEE and ICH (Fig 1A and 1C, respectively) across the range of BMI with NOAC vs. warfarin. Similar results were seen for each outcome when assessed by BW (median [25-75 %ile]: 81 [70-94] kg; 5-95 %ile: 55-119 kg).Conclusions: In this pooled analysis of the pivotal AF trials, use of NOAC was associated with a consistent reduction in S/SEE and ICH compared with warfarin across the range of BMI and BW.