학술논문

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Single- versus Double-Balloon Enteroscopy Performed by Endoscopist Experts in Single-Balloon Enteroscopy: A Single-Center Experience and Meta-Analysis
Document Type
Article
Source
Gut and Liver. Jul 30, 2017 11(4):520
Subject
Single-balloon enteroscopy
Double-balloon en-teroscopy
Balloon-assisted enteroscopy
Meta-analysis
Language
English
ISSN
1976-2283
Abstract
Background/Aims: Studies concerning the efficacy and safety of single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE) compared with that of double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) often appear to be conflicting. However, previous studies were performed by endoscopists who were less experienced in SBE compared with DBE. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of SBE and DBE data performed by a single enteroscopist, with expertise in SBE, using a prospective balloon-assisted enteroscopy registry from 2013 to 2015. Furthermore, we performed a comprehensive literature search and metaanalysis of available studies, including the current study, to clarify the efficacy and safety of SBE versus DBE. Results: A total of 65 procedures in 44 patients with SBE and 74 procedures in 69 patients with DBE were analyzed. There were no significant differences in diagnostic yield (61.1% vs 77.3%, respectively, p=0.397), therapeutic yield (39.1% vs 31.8%, respectively, p=0.548), and complication rate (4.4% vs 2.3%, p=1.000). In the meta-analysis, which included four randomized controlled trials and three observational studies, there were no significant differences in the pooled relative risk and odds ratio for diagnostic and therapeutic yield and complications of SBE compared with those of DBE. Conclusions: The performance of SBE appears to be similar to that of DBE in terms of diagnostic and therapeutic yield and complications. (Gut Liver 2017;11:520-527)