학술논문

RC 및 SFRC 외부 보-기둥 접합부에 대한 고강도 확대머리 철근의 정착강도
Development Strengths of High Strength Headed Bars of RC and SFRC Exterior Beam-Column Joint
Document Type
Article
Source
한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 논문집(KSMI) / Journal of The Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection (J. Korea Inst. Struct. Mai. Dec 31, 2023 27(6):94
Subject
Steel fiber
Beam-column joint
SD700
Headed bar
Development strength
강섬유
보-기둥 접합부
확대머리철근
정착강도
Language
Korean
English
ISSN
2234-6937
Abstract
본 연구에서는 철근콘크리트(RC) 및 강섬유보강콘크리트(SFRC) 외부 보-기둥 접합부에서 SD700인 확대머리철근의 정착성능을 실험적으로 평가하였다. 실험체는 총 10개로 제작되었으며 강섬유 보강 유무, 정착길이, 보의 유효춤, 스터럽 배근상세 등을 변수로 계획하였다. 실험결과, 실험체는 실험변수에 따라 측면파열파괴, 콘크리트 브레이크아웃파괴, 전단파괴 등이 나타났다. 정착길이를 변수로 한 RC 계열 실험체에서 정착길이가 25~80% 증가함에 따라 정착강도는 26.5~42.2% 증가하여 정착길이에 비례하지 않음을 확인하였다. 보의 유효춤이 2배인 JD 계열 실험체는 콘크리트 브레이크아웃파괴가 나타나 기준 실험체에 비하여 31.5~62% 최대내력이 감소하였다. 확대머리철근 주위의 전단보강근 간격이 기준실험체에 비하여 1/2배인 S 계열 실험체는 8.4~ 9.7% 최대내력이 증가하였다. SFRC 실험체 콘크리트 압축강도가 RC 실험체 콘크리트 압축강도에 비하여 29.3% 작게 평가되었지만, 정착강도는 7.3~12.2% 더 크게 증가하였다. 이에 강섬유 보강에 따른 확대머리 철근의 정착성능이 크게 향상됨을 확인하였다. KDS 기준의 정착길이 92%, 110%로 배근된 실험체의 실험 최대내력이 이론내력에 비하여 92%, 99%인 결과를 고려하면 안전율을 더욱 크게 고려할 필요가 있는 것으로 판단된다. 또한 정착길이 대비 보의 유효춤을 고려한 설계식 제시가 요구된다.
In this study, the development performance of the head bars, which is SD700, was experimentally evaluated at the RC (reinforced concrete) or SFRC (steel fiber reinforced concrete external beam-column joint. A total of 10 specimens were tested, and variables such as steel fibers, length of settlement, effective depth of the beam, and stirrups of the column were planned. As a result of the experiment, the specimens showed side-face blowout, concrete breakout, and shear failure depending on the experimental variables. In the RC series experiments with development length as a variable, it was confirmed that the development strength increased by 26.5~42.2% as the development length increased by 25-80%, which was not proportional to the development length. JD-based experiments with twice the effective depth of beams showed concrete breakout failure, reducing the maximum strength by 31.5% to 62% compared to the reference experiment. The S-series experiment, in which the spacing of the shear reinforcement around the enlarged head reinforcement was 1/2 times that of the reference experiment, increased the maximum strength by 8.4 to 9.7%. The concrete compressive strength of SFRC was evaluated to be 29.3% smaller than the concrete compressive strength of RC, but the development strength of SFRC specimens increased by 7.3% to 12.2%. Accordingly it was confirmed that the development performance of the head bar was greatly improved by reinforcing the steel fiber. Considering the results of 92% and 99% of the experimental maximum strength of the experiment arranged with 92% and 110% of the KDS-based settlement length, it is judged that the safety rate needs to be considered even more. In addition, it is required to present a design formula that considers the effective depth of the beam compared to the development length.

Online Access