부산대학교 도서관

The relationship of Work Injury Insurance and civil damage compensation is always under heated debate. In the perspective of civil law, it mainly concerns the amount of tort compensation. While in the perspective of social law, it is an issue of how to choose the mode of work injury relief. The litigators have not given a clear answer to this issue, which leads to different standards in practice and causes contradicts in judicial practice. Substantially, to choose the mode of work injury relief is a problem of value judging. This article believes that it better conforms to the goal of work injury relief and its value to adopt Compensation Mode. To achieve the goal of work injury relief, to better realize fairness and guarantee the human rights of labors, and to fit the developing trend of other countries all over the world, we shall adopt the mode of work injury insurance as priority, civil damage compensation as supplement and the right of recovery of social insurance institutions to the injurer as another supplement. Thus, Compensation Mode shall become the direction of China’s work injury relief. Therefore, we should also review on the Double Compensation Mode adopted in judicial practice currently.
工伤保险待遇与民事侵权损害赔偿的关系，历来是学界热议的问题。从民法的角度看此问题主要涉及侵权损害赔偿的数额，从社会法角度而言却事关工伤救济的模式选择问题。由于长期以来立法者对此问题一直未有明确表态，导致各地遵循不同的标准进行操作，由此引起司法实践中的混乱与矛盾。工伤救济模式的选择问题从本质上看是一个价值判断问题，笔者认为工伤救济采取“补偿模式”更为符合工伤救济所要达到的目的以及所承载的价值。以工伤保险优先、民事侵权赔偿作为补充、社会保险机构对过错加害人员具有追偿权的补充模式更有利于实现工伤救济的目的，更有利于实现公平和劳动者人权保障，也符合世界各国的发展趋势。因此，补充模式应该成为我国工伤救济模式的发展方向，当前对目前司法实践所采取的“双赔”模式进行检讨。