학술논문

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TAZOBACTAM/PIPERACILLIN AND PIPERACILLIN IN BACTERIAL PNEUMONIA / 細菌性肺炎に対するTazobactam/PiperacillinとPiperacillinの薬効比較試験成績
Document Type
Journal Article
Author
AKIHIRO HORIAKIHISA SHINDOAKIHO OHARAAKIRA OHISHIAKIRA SAITOAKIRA WATANABEATSUHIKO SATOATSUHISA TAMURAATSUSHI SAITOATSUSHI TAKAHASHIFUMIO MATSUMOTOFUMIYUKI KUZEHARUHITO HIRANOHARUMI SHISHIDOHIDEKAZU HANAKIHIDEKI IKEDAHIDEO GONDAHIROFUMI KATAYAMAHIROFUMI TANAKAHIROKI TSUKADAHIROKO ARIOKAHIRONOBU KOGAHIROSHI FUKUHARAHIROSHI INOUEHIROSHI SUGIMOTOISOKO OWANJINGORO SHIMADAJUN GOTOJUN INADOMEKANZO SUZUKIKAORU SHIMADAKATSUHIKO FURUUMIKAZUHIRO OKUNOKAZUKI KONISHIKAZUNORI OISHIKAZUNORI SHIMOGUCHIKAZUO KITAGAWAKAZUO SATOKAZUO TAKEBEKAZUSHIGE TSUYUGUCHIKAZUYA HIGASHINOKEIICHI MIKASAKEIZO MATSUMOTOKENICHI TAKEUCHIKENJI BANDOKENJI HASEGAWAKENZO TAKAGIKIYOSHI KONNOKIYOYASU FUKUSHIMAKOHEI HARAKOHJI MURABAYASHIKOHTARO KANEKOKOICHI DEGUCHIKOICHIRO KUDOKOICHIRO NAKADAKOJIRO YASUNAGAKOTARO OIZUMIKUNIHARU SHIDAKUNIO SIRATOMAKOTO KAWAKAMIMAKOTO KIMURAMAMORU OHTOMOMASAAKI ARAKAWAMASAHIDE TAKIIMASAHIKO YOSHIMOTOMASAHIRO SAKAMOTOMASAHIRO TAKAMOTOMASANORI HIGUCHIMASAO KAWAHARAMASARU KOYAMAMASARU NASUMASATO TOHNOMASAYOSHI SAWAKIMASAYUKI ANDOMASAZUMI SAISHOMASUMI TOMIZAWAMICHIO YAMAKIDOMIKIO FUJISHITAMITSUO OBANAMORITAKA SUGAMOTOO BABANAOHIKO TYONABAYASHINAOKI SAITANOBUHIRO NARITANOBUKI AOKINOBUYA OGAWANORIHISA AKIYAMAOSAMU KURIMURAOSAMU MORIYARIEKO KANANRINZO SOEJIMASABURO IZUMISAKURA KATOHSEIBUN YONEZUSHIGEKI ODAGIRISHIGEYUKI HOSHINOSHINICHIRO OHYAMASHINZO KAWAGUCHISHOHEI KUSAKASHOICHIRO IRIMAJIRISUSUMU HARADASUSUMU YOSHIDATADAKAZU HATTORITADASHI ISHIDATAIJI MASUYAMATAKAO KOIKETAKAOKI OHYAMATAKASHI MOHRITAKASHI NAKANOTAKASHI OGURATAKAYOSI OHNOTAKEHIKO HIRAMOTOTAKEO IMAITAKUYA SUZUKITASUKU SAKAMOTOTATSUO NAKATANITETSUYA NISHIGAKITOHRU YAMASAKITOSHIHARU MATSUSHIMATOSHIHIKO TAKEUCHITOSHIHIRO MORITOTOSHIHIRO NUKIWATOSHINOBU YAMAMOTOTOSHIYUKI YAMAMOTOTOYOKAZU TAMURATSUNEO ISHIBASHITSUNEO SAYAMATSUYOSHI NAGATAKEYASUKO HARADAYASUNOBU NODAYASUO ARAIYASUO MATSUOKAYASUO ONOYASUO TANNOYASUO YAMADAYASUYUKI SANOYOSHIAKI RIYOSHIHIRO HIRAIYOSHIHITO NIKIYOSHIKI ANAZAWAYOSHIRO MOCHIZUKIYOSHITAKA YAMANAKAYOSHIYUKI ANZAIYOSHIYUKI MITUTAKEYUMIKO GOTOYUTAKA NAKANO三笠 桂一下口 和矩中田 紘一郎中谷 龍王中野 孝司中野 豊丹野 恭夫久世 文幸二木 芳人井上 洋西今井 健郎今野 淳佐山 恒夫佐藤 和男佐藤 篤彦佐野 靖之光武 良幸入交 昭一郎出口 浩一副島 林造加藤 さくら北川 和生原 耕平原田 泰子原田 進古海 勝彦古賀 宏延吉本 正彦吉田 進坂本 正寛坂本 翊坂東 憲司堀 彰宏塚田 弘樹増山 泰治大友 守大山 眞一郎大山 高興大泉 耕太郎大湾 勤子大石 和徳大石 明大野 高義奥野 一裕守屋 修安永 幸二郎安藤 正幸安西 吉行宍戸 春美富沢 磨須美小倉 高志小原 秋穂小山 優小川 暢也小池 隆夫小田切 繁樹小花 光夫小西 一樹小野 康夫山中 吉隆山崎 透山木戸 道郎山本 俊信山本 俊幸山田 保夫島田 馨嶋田 甚五郎川上 誠川原 正士川口 信三工藤 宏一郎平居 義裕平本 雄彦平野 春人後藤 由美子後藤 純志田 國治成田 亘啓斉藤 厚日下 昌平星野 重幸普久原 浩最所 正純有岡 宏子服部 忠和望月 吉郎木村 丹杉本 浩史李 嘉明村林 晃二東野 一彌松岡 康夫松島 敏春松本 慶蔵松本 文夫栗村 統森戸 俊博樋口 雅則権田 秀雄武内 俊彦武内 健一武部 和夫毛利 孝永武 毅池田 英樹河南 里江子泉 三郎渡辺 彰澤木 政好瀧井 昌英片山 弘文田中 宏史田村 厚久田村 豊一白土 邦男石橋 凡雄石田 直福島 喜代康秋山 法久税田 直樹稲留 潤穴沢 予識米津 精文花木 英和荒井 康男荒川 正昭菅 守隆藤下 幹夫蝶名林 直彦西垣 哲哉貫和 敏博進藤 彰久遠野 正人那須 勝野田 康信金子 光太郎鈴木 幹三鈴木 沢耶長谷川 健司露口 一成青木 信樹馬場 基男高木 健三高本 正祇高橋 篤齋藤 玲
Source
The Japanese Journal of Antibiotics. 1995, 48(4):449
Subject
Language
Japanese
ISSN
0368-2781
2186-5477
Abstract
The efficacy, safety and usefulness of tazobactam/piperacillin (TAZ/PIPC), in bacterial pneumonia and lung abscess were determined with PIPC as the control in a multi-institutional comparative study a penicillin antibiotic for injection prepared by combining a newly developed β-lactamase inhibitor, tazobactam (TAZ), with a broad spectrum penicillin antibiotic, piperacillin (PIPC), at a ratio of 1: 4.TAZ/PIPC was intravenously injected at a dose of 2.5 g (titer) twice a day, and PIPC at a dose of 2.0 g (titer) twice a day as a rule for 14 days.The following results were obtained:1. The efficacy rates for bacterial pneumonia and lung abscess were 94% (80/85) in TAZ/PIPC group and 89% (70/79) in PIPC group, showing no significant difference between the twogroups.2. In a comparison of degrees of improvement in clinical symptoms, signs and laboratory findings, there were no significant differences between the two groups except for results on thoracic rales after three days of administration.3. As for bacteriological effects, the elimination rates of causative organisms were 98% (40/41) in the TAZ/PIPC group and 80% (28/35) in the PIPC group. Thus, the TAZ/PIPC group was significantly superior to the PIPC group. The TAZ/PIPC group showed significantly better eradication of bacateria as well. Bacteria considered to be pyogenic were detected in 80 patients (43 administered TAZ/PIPC and 37 administered PIPC), but β-lactamase production was confirmed in only 11 patients of each group. There were no significant differences in bacteriological effects among these patients. Minimum inhibitory concentrations of TAZ/PIPC against β-lactamase producing organisms were distinctly superior to those of PIPC.4. Side effects occurred in 10% (10/96) of the TAZ/PIPC group and 7% (7/95) of the PIPC group. Abnormal clinical laboratory test values were observed in 22% (20/92) of the TAZ/PIPC group and 18% (17/93) of the PIPC group. Thus, there were no significant differences between the two administration groups.5. The usefulness rate in the TAZ/PIPC group was 87% (75/86) and it was 85% (67/79) in the PIPC group, showing no significant difference between them.The results suggest that TAZ/PIPC administered at a dose of 2.5 g (titer) twice a day is more useful than PIPC administered at a dose of 2.0g (titer) twice a day in the treatment of bacterial pneumonia.