학술논문

Comparative Study of the Effectiveness of Mezlocillin and Ampicillin on Respiratory Tract Infection / 呼吸器感染症に対するMezlocillinとAmpicillinの薬効比較試験
Document Type
Journal Article
Author
Akihiko KUZEAkio AOYAGIAkio TACHIBANAAkira ITOAkira KINOSHITAAkira SAITOAkira UJIIEAkira YokoyamaAtsushi SAITOAtsushi SHIMOMURAChie KARIBEEiji NAKAMURAEiro TSUBURAFumiaki UCHIHIRAFumio MIKIFumio NAGAHAMAFumiro TANAKAFusanosuke YAMASAKUHajime WATANABEHaruaki ICHIMARUHideo AOKIHideo IKEMOTOHideo OHZEKIHideo SASAKIHidero NAKAZONOHidetoshi SHIBAKIHideyuki HASEGAWAHiroichi TANIMOTOHironobu IHARAHiroshi FUKUIHiroshi MINAMIHiroshi NAGANOHiroshi OKUBOHiroshi SUZUKIHiroshi TAKAGIHiroyasu KAWABEHiroyuki DOIHiroyuki KOBAYASHIHisashi NAKAHATAIchiro NAKAYAMAIppei FUJIMORIIzumi HAYASHIJingoro SHIMADAJunzaburo KABEKanzo SUZUKIKaori YASUDAKaoru OKADAKaoru OYAMAKatsuhiko MATSUIKatsuhiro OKAMOTOKatsumi ENDOKazue SADAMOTOKazuki KONISHIKazunori HARADAKazuo KONDOKazuo TAKEBEKazutoyo KANEKOKazuyoshi WATANABEKei YAGUCHIKeigo MAEHARAKeiichi NAKAGAWAKeiko IWAMOTOKeimei MASHIMOKeizo MATSUMOTOKen OSONOIKenichi IMAMURAKenji SAEKIKenji TAKAMATSUKentaro WATANABEKenzo SHIOTAKiyofumi ISHIKAWAKiyoko SAKAIKiyoshi KONNOKohei HARAKohya SHIBAKohzo MORIKoichiro NAKADAKokichi FUKUSHIMAKotaro OIZUMIKozue KOMORIKunihiko SHINDOKuninori SUZUKIKunio DOBASHIKyuichiro SEKINEMakio KURIHARAMamoru YAMADAMasafumi KITAOKAMasahisa OHMORIMasakatsu NISHIDAMasami ARAKAWAMasami UEDAMasao NAGASAWAMasao NAKATOMIMasaro KAJIMasaru KOYAMAMasataka KATSUMasayuki TACHIBANAMasumi TOMIZAWAMichio YAMAKIDOMichiyasu NAKANISHIMieko KAWAIMikihiko TANGOMitsuharu OGIMitsuko TAKAMURAMitsuo HASEMitsuo MASUDAMitsuo OBANAMorikuni ABEMotoichi TANAKAMunetaka KOMORINaofumi SUYAMANaomi KODOMARINaoyoshi MASAKINobuki AOKINobuo MAEKAWANorichika MATSUMOTONorio INABAOsamu ABEOsamu HAGIWARAOsamu KITAMOTOOsamu KURIMURAOsamu SEKINERinzo SOEJIMARyoichi AMITANIRyuzo FUEKISaburo KUREMATSUSeiichi MURAKAMISetsuo KOBAYASHIShigechika KADOShigeharu MORIOKAShigeki ODAGIRIShigeru MATSUMOTOShinichi TOMIOKAShinji OKUIShinya YASUDAShuichiro YOSHIDAShunji HAYASHISumio ARAISumio KISHIMOTOSumio YAMAOKATadanori KONDOTadashi MIYAHARATadashi MIYAZAWATadashi TAKIGAMITakaaki AKAGAWATakafumi YANOTakahiko KONNOTakashi AKIYAMATakashi NAKAGAWATakashi WATANABETakehisa YAMAJITakehito NAKABAYASHITakuro MATSUMOTOTamotsu TAKISHIMATatsuo SAITOTatsuya OHNUKITetsuharu TANAKATetsuo KOMORITohru NAGASAWAToshihiro GOTOToshikazu NEMOTOToshio HOJOToshio KOBAYASHIToshiyuki YAMAMOTOToyokazu TAMURATsugio NAKAZAWATsuneharu BABAYasunori TANAKAYasuyoshi SAKURAIYayoi OKAWAYoichi MIYAHARAYoichiro ICHIKAWAYomei HIRAGAYoshihiro KUMASAKAYoshihiro TAKIHARAYoshihiro TAKISHITAYoshimaru USUDAYoshinobu TAKASHIROYoshio KINOSHITAYoshio KOBAYASHIYoshiro MOCHIZUKIYoshiro ODAYoshiro SAWAEYoshito NIKIYuichi KOIZUMIYukio NISHIMOTOYuruko OKAMOTOYutaka MOTOHASHI三木 文雄上田 雅己下村 惇中園 秀朗中富 昌夫中山 一朗中川 圭一中川 高志中村 栄治中林 武仁中沢 次夫中田 紘一郎中畑 久中西 通泰丹呉 幹彦久世 彰彦二木 芳人井原 裕宣今村 憲市今野 孝彦今野 淳伊藤 章佐々木 英夫佐伯 憲二内平 文章前原 敬吾前川 暢夫副島 林造加地 正郎勝 正孝北本 治北條 敏夫南 浩原 耕平原田 一紀可部 順三郎吉田 秀一郎土居 裕幸土橋 邦生塩田 憲三増田 光夫大久保 滉大山 馨大川 弥生大森 雅久大泉 耕太郎大貫 達也大関 秀雄奥井 津二安田 佳織安田 真也安部 理定本 和江宮原 正宮原 洋一宮沢 正富岡 真一富沢 磨須美小山 優小林 宏行小林 敏男小林 節雄小林 芳夫小森 こずえ小森 哲夫小森 宗敬小泉 雄一小泊 直美小田 芳郎小田切 繁樹小花 光夫小西 一樹山作 房之輔山岡 澄夫山木戸 道郎山本 俊幸山田 衛山路 武久岡本 勝博岡本 緩子岡田 薫岩本 恵子岸本 寿男嶋田 甚五郎川部 汎康市丸 治秋市川 洋一郎平賀 洋明後東 俊博斉藤 玲斉藤 篤斉藤 龍生望月 吉郎木下 与四男木下 啓本橋 豊村上 誠一松井 克彦松本 卓郎松本 慶蔵松本 法親松本 茂林 俊治林 泉柴 孝也柾木 尚義栗原 牧夫栗村 統根本 俊和桜井 康喜森 幸三森岡 茂治榑松 三郎横山 明武部 和夫氏家 昭池本 秀雄沢江 義郎河合 美枝子渡辺 一功渡辺 健太郎渡辺 肇渡辺 隆滝上 正滝下 佳寛滝原 義宏滝島 任熊坂 義裕田中 二三郎田中 元一田中 哲治田中 康徳田村 豊一真下 啓明矢口 慧矢野 敬文石川 清文福井 洸福島 孝吉秋山 隆司稲葉 宣雄立花 征幸立花 昭生笛木 隆三網谷 良一芝木 秀俊苅部 千恵荒井 澄夫荒川 雅美荻 光春萩原 修薄田 芳丸藤森 一平螺良 英郎西本 幸男西田 正勝谷本 普一貴田岡 正史賀戸 重允赤川 高明近藤 一雄近藤 忠徳進藤 邦彦遅野井 健遠藤 勝実酒井 浄子金子 和豊鈴木 国功鈴木 寛鈴木 幹三長沢 亨長沢 正夫長浜 文雄長谷 光雄長谷川 英之長野 準関根 球一郎関根 理阿部 守邦青木 信樹青木 秀夫青柳 昭雄須山 尚史馬場 恒春高城 義信高木 浩高村 光子高松 健次
Source
感染症学雑誌 / Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 1981, 55(4):276
Subject
Ampicillin
Mezlocillin
Respiratory Tract Infection
Well-controlled-comparative study
Language
Japanese
ISSN
0387-5911
1884-569X
Abstract
To evaluate antibacterial effectiveness, safety and clinical usefulness of mezlocillin (MZPC), multi clinical comparative studies against ampicillin (ABPC) were conducted in patients with lower respiratory tract infections. The patients were treated for up to 14 days with a dose of 2 g b.i.d. of either MZPC or ABPC by drip infusion. A total of 264 patients entered the trials. A comparison of the effectiveness of both test drugs was made in 233 cases (MZPC; 111 cases, ABPC; 122 cases).An evaluation of their respective safety in 252 patients (MZPC; 120, ABPC; 132) and usefulness for 237 patients (MZPC; 113, ABPC; 124) was made.Comparison between the two treatment groups was made for all cases and stratified by diagnosis, namely, bacterial pneumonia, pneumonia group (bacterial pneumonia, mycoplasmal pneumonia, PAP and lung abscess) and R.T.I other than pneumonia.A comparison of clinical efficacy, rated MZPC in 76.6%, and ABPC treatment in 64.8% as “effective”. The difference between the two drugs in statistically significant. When patients were stratified by diagnosis, MZPC treatment showed an efficacy rate of 80.4%, and ABPC treatment of 70.0% in patients with bacterial pneumonia. In patients with pneumonia, MZPC treatment was effective in 76.6%, and ABPC treatment in 70.3% of the case load, without however any statistical difference. Comparison of the therapeutic results of the two treatment groups in patients with RTI other than pneumonia, MZPC was effective in 76.5%, and ABPC in 56.3%. The difference is statistically significant. Comparison of efficacy after stratified by severity of diseases and complications, MZPC treatment showed superiority in the group of all moderate to severe cases. On further stratification of all cases superiority of MZPC was seen in the group of moderate to severe cases of RTI other than pneumonia. When studied in connection with complications, superiority of MZPC was observed in all cases of A group complications, namely with complications which may affect the clinical course of infections and/or the therapeutic effect of the drugs, and also in the pneumonia group with A group complications.Adverse reactions attributable to the test drugs were noted in 5.0% of patients treated with MZPC and in 9.1% of those who received ABPC.MZPC treatment was rated as useful in 75.2% of patients as compared with 60.5% with ABPC, showing statistically significant superiority of MZPC over ABPC. These results justify to conclude that MZPC is a highly effective, useful and safe drug for the treatmens of lower respiratory tract infections especially for patients with intractable and/or moderate to severe infections.