부산대학교 도서관

1. Introduction As a method of reorganizing public facilities, a method of making a complex by turning school vacant classrooms and thus making them community-cores is often presented. However, little has been studied about how to predict the amount of changing vacant classrooms and implement a reorganization plan. This study aim to present a method of reorganizing public facilities by forming a complex and thus implementing a community-core with multifunction by means of renovating vacant classrooms into social education facilities. Through a case study based on the actual situation of the target city, the possibility of reorganizing by turning into a community-core and a complex is confirmed, and its method is proposed and organized. Just as a reorganization plan is actually planned, a case study is conducted. Next, the case study proposals are compared and evaluated, and the effectiveness of the reorganization method proposed last is confirmed. 2. Evaluation of the existing facilities and estimation of the future demand Here, as an evaluation of the existing facilities, we grasp the situation of aging, grasp the seismic performance, grasp the facility placement, predict the demand of social education facilities from the future population estimation, and predict the demand of school facilities from the estimated future number of children and students 3. Setting the basic reorganization policy Based on the above, Table 5 is set as policies and examination conditions for reorganization. The facility relocation policy are explained below. · Since earthquake resistance of the schools has been confirmed, it is judged that all school buildings can be utilized. However, for school buildings that have exceeded their service lives, it is evaluated that they need repairing. · The area of a public hall and a library is designated a junior high school district, and one library and one public hall should be placed in each junior high school district. 4. Examination of the renovation model plan As shown in Fig. 8, the model plan is examined. (1) Based on the prediction of number of classes in each year, grasp the schools that can be converted to a complex, and also grasp the years when renovation can. (2) In each junior high school district, select the optimum one among all the possible combining patterns (Table 8). (3) Create a plan for the entire city area (plan A) that integrates the plans for all the junior high school districts and corrects the bias of the construction schedules. (4) Create plan B that grants the most accessible school an expansion. 5. Evaluation of the reorganization model Compare A, B, and the current arrangement (Table 13). Compared to others, plan A is better evaluated in terms of the number of times of construction, etc. Plan A has a facility with high usefulness as a base in three junior high school districts, but plan B has such a facility in five districts. Because of this, the evaluation of plan A is somewhat inferior to that of plan B. Proximity to public halls, plan A is inferior to the current situation. However, since 70% or more of the total are accessible with the distance of less than 1 km, it is judged as an acceptable range. 6. Disscussion We discussed about how this method can be used in other municipalities and financial evaluation. 7. Summary As a result: 1) It was shown that the reorganization of facilities is realized by making bases out of surplus space. 2) The examination procedure were organized and shown.