학술논문

Reference Standards for Peak Rating of Perceived Exertion during Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing: Data from FRIEND
Document Type
Periodical
Source
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. January 1, 2023, Vol. 55 Issue 1, p74, 6 p.
Subject
Cardiovascular agents -- Evaluation -- Standards
Cardiology -- Physiological aspects -- Analysis
Health
Sports and fitness
Ball State University -- Standards -- Evaluation
Language
English
ISSN
0195-9131
Abstract
Byline: JAMES E. PETERMAN, Fisher Institute of Health and Well-Being, College of Health, Ball State University, Muncie, IN ; ROSS ARENA, Department of Physical Therapy, College of Applied Science, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL ; JONATHAN MYERS, Division of Cardiology, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System and Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA ; MATTHEW P. HARBER, Clinical Exercise Physiology Laboratory, College of Health, Ball State University, Muncie, IN ; AMANDA R. BONIKOWSKE, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN ; RAY W. SQUIRES, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN ; LEONARD A. KAMINSKY, Fisher Institute of Health and Well-Being, College of Health, Ball State University, Muncie, IN Abstract INTRODUCTION: Peak rating of perceived exertion (RPE) is measured during clinical cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) and is commonly used as a subjective indicator of maximal effort. However, no study to date has reported reference standards or the distribution of peak RPE across a large cohort of apparently healthy individuals. PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine reference standards for peak RPE when using the 6-20 Borg scale for both treadmill and cycle tests. METHODS: The analysis included 9551 tests (8821 treadmill, 730 cycle ergometer) from 13 laboratories within the Fitness Registry and Importance of Exercise National Database (FRIEND). Using data from tests conducted January 1, 1980, to January 1, 2021, percentiles of peak RPE for men and women were determined for each decade from 20 to 89 yr of age for treadmill and cycle exercise modes. Two-way ANOVA was used to compare differences in peak RPE values between sexes and across age groups. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences in RPE between age groups whether the test was performed on a treadmill or cycle ergometer ( P < 0.05). However, the mean and median RPE for each sex, age group, and test mode were between 18 and 19. In addition, 83% of participants met the traditional RPE criteria of [greater than or equal] 18 for indicating sufficient maximal effort. CONCLUSIONS: This report provides the first normative reference standards for peak RPE in both male and female individuals performing CPX on a treadmill or cycle ergometer. Furthermore, these reference standards highlight the general consistency of peak RPE responses during CPX.