부산대학교 도서관

Byline: Dawn C. Buse, From the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York (D.C.B., C.E.A., R.B.L.); Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (S.J.N.); Medcurio, Oakland, California (W.(B.)F.S.); Vedanta Research, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (M.L.R.); MIST Research, Wilmington, North Carolina (K.M.F.); AbbVie, Irvine, California (A.M.A.).; Stephanie J. Nahas; Walter (Buzz) F. Stewart; Cynthia E. Armand; Michael L. Reed; Kristina M. Fanning; Aubrey Manack Adams; Richard B. Lipton Abstract OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to ascertain whether level of optimization of acute treatment of migraine is related to work productivity across the spectrum of migraine. METHODS: Data were from the Chronic Migraine Epidemiology and Outcomes (CaMEO) Study, an internet-based longitudinal survey. Respondents with migraine who reported full-time employment and use of [greater than or equal] 1 acute prescription medication for migraine were included. We determined relationships among lost productive time (LPT; measured with the Migraine Disability Assessment Scale), acute treatment optimization (Migraine Treatment Optimization Questionnaire- ), and monthly headache days (MHDs). RESULTS: There was a direct relationship between LPT and MHD category. Greater acute treatment optimization was associated with lower total LPT, less absenteeism, and less presenteeism within each MHD category. CONCLUSIONS: Optimizing acute treatment for migraine may reduce LPT in people with migraine and reduce indirect costs.