학술논문

Limited evolution of the actionable metastatic cancer genome under therapeutic pressure
Document Type
Report
Source
Nature Medicine. September 2021, Vol. 27 Issue 9, p1553, 11 p.
Subject
Netherlands
Language
English
ISSN
1078-8956
Abstract
Genomic profiling is critical for the identification of treatment options for patients with metastatic cancer, but it remains unclear how frequently this procedure should be repeated during the course of the disease. To address this, we analyzed whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data of 250 biopsy pairs, longitudinally collected over the treatment course of 231 adult patients with a representative variety of metastatic solid malignancies. Within the biopsy interval (median, 6.4 months), patients received one or multiple lines of (mostly) standard-of-care (SOC) treatments, with all major treatment modalities being broadly represented. SOC biomarkers and biomarkers for clinical trial enrollment could be identified in 23% and 72% of biopsies, respectively. For SOC genomic biomarkers, we observed full concordance between the first and the second biopsy in 99% of pairs. Of the 219 biomarkers for clinical trial enrollment that were identified in the first biopsies, we recovered 94% in the follow-up biopsies. Furthermore, a second WGS analysis did not identify additional biomarkers for clinical trial enrollment in 91% of patients. More-frequent genomic evolution was observed when considering specific genes targeted by small-molecule inhibitors or hormonal therapies (21% and 22% of cases, respectively). Together, our data demonstrate that there is limited evolution of the actionable genome of treated metastases. A single WGS analysis of a metastatic biopsy is generally sufficient to identify SOC genomic biomarkers and to identify investigational treatment opportunities. Whole-genome sequencing of metastatic biopsies longitudinally sampled during the course of anticancer treatment reveals that the actionable metastatic cancer genome remains relatively stable over time.
Author(s): Joris van de Haar [sup.1] [sup.2] [sup.3] , Louisa R. Hoes [sup.1] [sup.3] , Paul Roepman [sup.4] , Martijn P. Lolkema [sup.5] , Henk M. W. Verheul [sup.6] , [...]