학술논문

Population repeated time‐to‐event analysis of exacerbations in asthma patients: A novel approach for predicting asthma exacerbations based on biomarkers, spirometry, and diaries/questionnaires
Document Type
Report
Source
CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology. October 2021, Vol. 10 Issue 10, p1221, 15 p.
Subject
Models
Medical research -- Models
Asthma -- Models
Spirometry -- Models
Biological markers -- Models
Medicine, Experimental -- Models
Language
English
Abstract
Study Highlights WHAT IS THE CURRENT KNOWLEDGE ON THE TOPIC? For early‐stage asthma trials, decisions can be guided by changes in biomarkers, spirometry, or diaries/questionnaires, instead of asthma exacerbations (which [...]
: Identification of covariates, including biomarkers, spirometry, and diaries/questionnaires, that predict asthma exacerbations would allow better clinical predictions, shorter phase II trials and inform decisions on phase III design, and/or initiation (go/no‐go). The objective of this work was to characterize asthma‐exacerbation hazard as a function of baseline and time‐varying covariates. A repeated time‐to‐event (RTTE) model for exacerbations was developed using data from a 52‐week phase IIb trial, including 502 patients with asthma randomized to placebo or 70 mg, 210 mg, or 490 mg astegolimab every 4 weeks. Covariate analysis was performed for 20 baseline covariates using the full random effects modeling approach, followed by time‐varying covariate analysis of nine covariates using the stepwise covariate model (SCM) building procedure. Following the SCM, an astegolimab treatment effect was explored. Diary‐based symptom score (difference in objective function value [dOFV] of −83.7) and rescue medication use (dOFV = −33.5), and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (dOFV = −14.9) were identified as significant time‐varying covariates. Of note, time‐varying covariates become more useful with more frequent measurements, which should favor the daily diary scores over others. The most influential baseline covariates were exacerbation history and diary‐based symptom score (i.e., symptom score was important as both time‐varying and baseline covariate). A (nonsignificant) astegolimab treatment effect was included in the final model because the limited data set did not allow concluding the remaining effect size as irrelevant. Without time‐varying covariates, the treatment effect was statistically significant (p < 0.01). This work demonstrated the utility of a population RTTE approach to characterize exacerbation hazard in patients with severe asthma.