학술논문

Survival Analysis in Patients with Laryngeal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Document Type
Academic Journal
Source
Life (Basel). January 2023, Vol. 13 Issue 2
Subject
Care and treatment
Analysis
Patient outcomes
Cancer research -- Analysis
Radiotherapy -- Analysis
Cancer patients -- Care and treatment -- Patient outcomes
Laryngeal cancer -- Patient outcomes -- Care and treatment
Oncology, Experimental -- Analysis
Cancer -- Research
Language
English
ISSN
2075-1729
Abstract
Author(s): Elena Molina-Fernández [1]; José M. Palacios-García (corresponding author) [1,*]; Ramón Moreno-Luna [1]; Tomás Herrero-Salado [1]; Julio Ventura-Díaz [1]; Serafín Sánchez-Gómez [1]; Ángel Vilches-Arenas [2] 1. Introduction The World Health [...]
Introduction: The worldwide incidence rate of laryngeal cancer is declining. However, the 5-year survival for these patients has decreased in recent years from 66% to 63%. This may be due to changes in the treatment of the disease. The present study aimed to evaluate the survival rate of patients with LC according to the stage of the disease and the treatment applied. For this purpose, surgical versus organ preservation protocols (OPP) based on chemoradiotherapy were evaluated. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary hospital. The study included adult patients with a clinical diagnosis of primary LC. Patients with LC and systemic metastases and those with synchronous tumors at diagnosis were excluded. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the association between exposure to LC treatment and the time to event (death). Overall survival (OS), cause-specific survival (CSS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated. Results: Patients with advanced tumors (stages III and IV) had almost three times the risk of LC death than those in the initial tumor stages (I and II) [HR CCS = 2.89 (95%CI 1.30–6.39)]; [HR OS = 2.01 (95%CI 1.35–2.98)]. Patients who underwent surgical treatment had a higher chance of survival than those who were treated according to OPP [HR = 0.62; 95%CI (0.38–1.02)] in CSS, 0.74 [95%CI (0.50–1.90)] in OS, and 0.61 [95%CI (0.40–0.91)] in DFS. Discussion: OPP changed the management of patients with advanced stages of LC, establishing CRT as an alternative to surgery. Our data did not reveal clinically relevant differences in OS between patients treated with OPP and those who underwent surgery; however, we reported differences in the DFS rate after five years of follow-up in favor of the surgery-treated group of patients. Conclusion: Surgical treatment improves CSS and DFS at five years in patients with initial LC with respect to radiation therapy alone. Furthermore, surgical treatment associated with complementary radiation therapy offers better CSS and DFS in patients with advanced LC.