학술논문

The Association between Obesity and Reduced Weight-Adjusted Bone Mineral Content in Older Adults: A New Paradigm That Contrasts with the Obesity Paradox
Document Type
Academic Journal
Source
Nutrients. January 2024, Vol. 16 Issue 3
Subject
World Health Organization
Diseases
Physiological aspects
Obesity -- Physiological aspects
Bone density -- Physiological aspects
Body mass index -- Physiological aspects
Type 2 diabetes -- Physiological aspects
Body weight -- Physiological aspects
Elderly -- Physiological aspects
Aged -- Physiological aspects
Bones -- Density
Language
English
ISSN
2072-6643
Abstract
Author(s): Antonino De Lorenzo [1,†]; Massimo Pellegrini [2,†]; Paola Gualtieri [1]; Leila Itani [3]; Giulia Frank [4]; Marwan El Ghoch (corresponding author) [2,*]; Laura Di Renzo [1] 1. Introduction Obesity [...]
The relationship between body weight and bone mass in the elderly remains unclear, and whether obesity is a protective factor is still a matter of debate. For this reason, the aim of this study is to assess the association between body mass index (BMI) and bone mineral content adjusted by body weight, expressed as a percentage (w-BMC%), and to test the validity of the obesity paradox in this context. A cohort of 1404 older adults was categorized according to the World Health Organization’s BMI cut-off points and completed a total and segmental body composition measurement by means of a dual X-ray absorptiometry scan. Individuals with obesity displayed a lower mean w-BMC% (3.06 ± 0.44%; 2.60 ± 0.37%) compared to those who were normal-weight (3.95 ± 0.54%; 3.38 ± 0.48%) and overweight (3.06 ± 0.44%; 3.04 ± 0.37%) in both genders. Linear regression analysis also showed a negative association between BMI and w-BMC% in males (β = −0.09; p < 0.001) and females (β = −0.06; p < 0.001). Finally, among individuals with obesity, and after adjusting for age, the linear regression models revealed a significant decrease of 0.75% and 0.28% in w-BMC% for every one-unit increase in the trunk fat/appendicular lean mass ratio in both males (β = −0.749; p < 0.0001) and females (β = −0.281; p < 0.001). In conclusion, we suggest a new paradigm regarding the impact of obesity on bone mass, in which the former does not appear to be a protective factor of the latter, especially in individuals with central obesity and low muscle mass.