학술논문
Perioperative Complications of Laparoscopic and Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
Document Type
Report
Concert review
Concert review
Author
Source
The Journal of Urology. Feb, 2006, Vol. 175 Issue 2, p541, 6 p.
Subject
Language
English
ISSN
0022-5347
Abstract
To link to full-text access for this article, visit this link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00156-4 Byline: Jim C. Hu (a), Rebecca A. Nelson (b), Timothy G. Wilson (c), Mark H. Kawachi (c), S. Adam Ramin (c), Clayton Lau (c), Laura E. Crocitto (c) Keywords: prostate; prostatectomy; robotics; laparoscopy; prostatic neoplasms Abbreviations: LRP, laparoscopic radical prostatectomy; POD, postoperative day; RAP, robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy Abstract: While it remains controversial whether LRP or da Vinci.sup.[R] RAP offers any advantages over radical retropubic prostatectomy, LRP and RAP are being used more frequently. We reviewed our experience with these minimally invasive techniques. Author Affiliation: (a) Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (b) Department of Biostatistics, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California (c) Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California Article History: Received 24 March 2005