학술논문

Relapse in patients with limited‐stage ocular adnexal lymphoma treated by chemoimmunotherapy: Extended follow‐up of a phase 2 study
Document Type
Report
Source
Cancer Medicine. July 2022, Vol. 11 Issue 14, p2817, 7 p.
Subject
Care and treatment
Prognosis
Product development
Clinical trials
Cancer treatment
Cyclophosphamide -- Product development
Prednisolone -- Product development
Recurrence (Disease) -- Care and treatment -- Prognosis
Medical research
Radiotherapy
Lymphomas -- Care and treatment -- Prognosis
Medicine, Experimental
Diseases -- Relapse
Cancer -- Care and treatment
Language
English
ISSN
2045-7634
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Ocular adnexal mucosa‐associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma (OAML) is a type of extra‐nodal marginal zone lymphoma (EMZL) with an indolent course and a good response to radiotherapy. Therefore, radiotherapy has [...]
: Background: Approximately 50% of limited‐stage ocular adnexal mucosa‐associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma (OAML) patients with adverse prognostic factors relapse after radiotherapy. Chemoimmunotherapy has been proposed as an alternative frontline therapy. However, only a few studies have reported its long‐term treatment outcome. Methods: In 2011, we commenced a phase 2 trial to investigate the efficacy of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisolone (R‐CVP) in bilateral and non‐conjunctival limited‐stage OAML patients. Results of the clinical trial showed a response rate of 100% and a 4‐year progression‐free survival of 90.3% without significant toxicity. We extended the study period to December 2020 to determine the long‐term efficacy of R‐CVP chemoimmunotherapy. Results: At a median observation period of 66.0 months, eight of 33 study patients had relapsed. The cumulative incidence of relapse was 18.9% at 5 years and 44.7% at 8 years. The majority of relapses developed more than 4 years after treatment. Local relapse was more prevalent than distant relapse. The relapse risk of orbital and lacrimal diseases was likely to be higher than that of conjunctival and eyelid diseases (HR: 2.5, 95% CI: 0.498–12.500, p = 0.25). Conclusion: Although the response rate was remarkable for chemoimmunotherapy, the risk of late relapse was considerable. Based on our findings, clinical trials for limited‐stage OAML patients should have a long‐term observation period. To minimize radiation toxicity and reduce the risk of delayed relapse (local relapse and distant relapse), a future study with sequential or combination treatment of local low‐dose radiation and systemic chemoimmunotherapy can be considered.