학술논문

Outcomes of surveillance mammography after treatment of primary breast cancer: a population-based case series
Document Type
Report
Source
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. March, 2009, Vol. 114 Issue 2, p169, 10 p.
Subject
Breast cancer -- Drug therapy
Breast cancer -- Analysis
Public health -- Analysis
Tamoxifen -- Analysis
Mammography -- Analysis
Oncology, Experimental -- Analysis
Medical policy -- Analysis
Cancer -- Research
Cancer -- Analysis
Cancer -- Adjuvant treatment
Language
English
ISSN
0167-6806
Abstract
Byline: Lawrence Paszat (1,2), Rinku Sutradhar (1), Eva Grunfeld (3), Corona Gainford (2), Veronique Benk (1,4), Susan Bondy (1,5), Doug Coyle (6), Claire Holloway (7), Carol Sawka (8,9), Rene Shumak (8), Katherine Vallis (4), Carl Walraven (1,6) Keywords: Surveillance mammography; Breast cancer survivors; Cancer recurrence in initially conserved breast; Metachronous contralateral breast cancer Abstract: Goal To ascertain outcomes of surveillance mammography (SM) following treatment of early stage unilateral primary breast cancer (PBC) in a population based case series. Methods Random samples from all 12,279 women having breast surgery within 4 months after diagnosis of PBC, between July 1991and December 1993 in Ontario, were drawn from a database created by deterministic linkage of PBC files from the Ontario Cancer Registry (OCR) with episodes of breast surgery extracted from the hospital Discharge Abstract Database (DAD), and mammography from the Ontario physician billings database (OHIP). Among women having aY=1 episode(s) of breast surgery subsequent (SBS) to the date of diagnosis up to December 2000, a sample of 1,200/5,064 (23.7%) was drawn, and among women with no SBS, a sample of 400/7,215 (5.5%). Among these two samples, operative, pathology, and mammography reports were abstracted from original charts. Treatments were abstracted and categorized. Women with complete data for Stages 1 and 2 unilateral PBC were included. From the subsequent surgery sample, 609/1,200 (50.8%) were excluded because of simultaneous or sequential bilateral breast cancers or mastectomies within 6 months, missing stage information, Stage 3 or 4 PBC, or missing primary charts. From the no subsequent surgery sample, 90/400 (22.5%) were excluded by the same criteria. Episodes of bilateral 2-view X-ray mammography, beginning aY=6 months after the diagnosis of unilateral PBC, and if multiple, at least 11 months apart, and not prompted by a clinical concern or symptom, were classified as SM. We confirmed episodes of cancer recurrence within the ipsilateral conserved breast (CRICB) and metachronous contralateral primary breast cancer (CPBC) aY=6 months after the diagnosis of the unilateral PBC from original operative and pathology reports. We used Cox models to describe the association of exposure to aY=1 episode(s) of SM with the risk of death from breast cancer among the study population, and separately among women experiencing CRICB or CPBC. Results Eligible women comprising 591/1,200 and 310/400 produced a combined case series of 901/1,600 (56.3%). Women with aY=1 episode(s) of SM numbered 721/901 (80.0%). We confirmed 84 CRICB events among 584 women initially treated by lumpectomy (14.4%), and 49 CPBC events among all 901 women in the study population (5.4%). Among women having aY=1 episode(s), the 25th percentile of observed follow up was 1,631 days, the 50th, 4,287 days, and the 75th 5,011 days. Among women without any SM, the 25th percentile of observed follow-up was 440 days, the 50th, 891 days, and the 75th, 1,849 days. Hazard ratio (HR) for death due to breast cancer associated with aY=1 episode of SM was 0.28 (95% CI 0.22--0.37), adjusted for age, stage, type of surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy, and tamoxifen. Among 84/584 women with CRICB, unadjusted HR = 0.36 (95%CI 0.13, 1.00) and among 49/901 women with CPBC, unadjusted HR = 0.86 (0.20--3.77). Conclusion SM was associated with a significant reduction in the hazard for breast cancer death. Among women who experienced CRICB, the reduction was of borderline significance, and the reduction was not significant among women who experienced CPBC. Author Affiliation: (1) Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada (2) Department of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, G158 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, Canada, M4N 3M5 (3) Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada (4) Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (5) Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (6) Ottawa Health Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada (7) Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (8) Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada (9) Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada Article History: Registration Date: 18/03/2008 Received Date: 06/12/2007 Accepted Date: 18/03/2008 Online Date: 27/03/2008