부산대학교 도서관

This article critically examines the consequences of different levels of public participation in decision-making processes for chronically disadvantaged and marginalised people. We present a case study of a public consultation commissioned by the UK government as part of a broader study into the feasibility of resettlement of the Chagos Archipelago, a remote British Overseas Territory in the Indian Ocean. The UK government has a long and troubled history of entanglements with the Chagossian community. We argue that the government and the consultants it commissioned failed to engage with this complex history, leading to particular challenges in establishing trust among community members and hindering the effectiveness of the consultation process. We show that consultations are not neutral, one-off 'fact-finding' endeavours but politically loaded exercises with lasting consequences for communities in terms of power, participation and vulnerability. We conclude that those involved in commissioning or conducting participatory projects should consider the historical, political and socio-economic dynamics of stakeholder communities to determine instances in which collaboration or empowerment (rather than merely dissemination, consultation or involvement) may be required to achieve fair, effective decision-making. Keywords: community consultation, resettlement, participation, trust, Chagos
Introduction: a spectrum of public participation This article critically analyses the consequences of different levels of public participation in decision-making processes for chronically disadvantaged and marginalised people. The International Association [...]