학술논문

Stakeholder engagement and participation in the design, delivery, and dissemination of the ostomy self-management telehealth (OSMT) program
Document Type
Academic Journal
Source
Supportive Care in Cancer. July, 2022, Vol. 30 Issue 7, p6187, 7 p.
Subject
Company business management
Medical research
Medicine, Experimental
Nurses
Evidence-based medicine
Language
English
ISSN
0941-4355
Abstract
Purpose Stakeholder engagement is increasingly integrated into clinical research processes. We conducted a mixed methods analysis to describe stakeholders' (peer ostomates, ostomy nurses, telehealth engineers) perceptions of their engagement and participation in a multisite, randomized trial of a telehealth-delivered curriculum for cancer survivors with ostomies. Methods Stakeholder notes were analyzed using narrative analysis. We constructed a 15-item survey that assessed the following areas: adherence to stakeholder engagement principles, engagement/influence throughout the study process, impact on perceived well-being, and satisfaction. Stakeholders were invited to complete the survey anonymously. Quantitative survey data were tabulated through summary statistics. Results Across intervention sessions, an average of 7.7 ± 1.4 stakeholders attended and 2.6 ± 1.4 submitted a note per session. The survey response rate was 73% (11/15). Stakeholders reported high agreement that the study adhered to engagement principles (91% reciprocal relationships, 100% co-learning, partnership, and transparency/honesty/trust). They felt highly engaged (18% moderate, 73% great deal) and that they had influence on study initiation (27% moderate, 55% great deal), intervention delivery (9% moderate, 82% great deal), fidelity assessment (18% moderate, 73% great deal), analysis and interpretation (55% moderate, 27% great deal), and dissemination (45% moderate, 45% great deal). They reported high overall satisfaction with roles (91% great deal), believed the program was helpful for participants (91%), and that serving on study team benefited their own well-being (100%). Conclusions Our strategy of stakeholder inclusion led to high engagement, input, satisfaction, and belief in success of program, which could be mirrored in other trials.
Author(s): Christopher Wendel [sup.1], Virginia Sun [sup.2] [sup.3], Nancy Tallman [sup.4], Christie Simons [sup.4], Peter Yonsetto [sup.5], Frank Passero [sup.6], Deborah Donahue [sup.6], Dan Fry [sup.6], Roger Iverson [sup.7], Pamela [...]