학술논문

Evaluation of the antimicrobial activity and safety of Rhus vulgaris (Anacardiaceae) extracts
Document Type
Academic Journal
Source
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies. September 10, 2020, Vol. 20 Issue 1
Subject
Kenya Medical Research Institute -- Safety and security measures
Staphylococcus aureus infections -- Drug therapy
Tetracyclines -- Analysis -- Safety and security measures -- Health aspects
Staphylococcus aureus -- Safety and security measures -- Health aspects -- Analysis
Flavonoids -- Health aspects -- Safety and security measures -- Analysis
Saponins -- Analysis -- Safety and security measures -- Health aspects
Microbial drug resistance -- Drug therapy
Metronidazole -- Safety and security measures -- Analysis -- Health aspects
Infection -- Drug therapy
Biological products -- Health aspects -- Safety and security measures -- Analysis
Methanol -- Analysis -- Safety and security measures -- Health aspects
Developing countries -- Safety and security measures -- Health aspects -- Analysis
Methicillin -- Safety and security measures -- Health aspects -- Analysis
Language
English
ISSN
2662-7671
Abstract
Background Medicinal plants have been used in the treatment of various ailments in most developing countries. Oral infections are the most prevalent diseases in man. The Rhus family has been found to have antimicrobial, antimalarial, and anti-inflammatory properties. Few studies have been done on Rhus vulgaris Meikle. A study was conducted to determine the effect of Rhus vulgaris Meikle stem bark extracts against selected oral pathogenic microorganisms and the safety of the extracts in vitro and in vivo. Methods Methanol:dichloromethane (1:1), methanol and aqueous extracts were tested for bacteriostatic and bactericidal effects against Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans. Cytotoxicity of the active extracts was determined using Vero E6 cell lines while safety was evaluated in mice and rats. Phytochemical screening was performed on the methanol extracts. One-way ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparisons tests were performed using IBM SPSS statistics 20.0 for antimicrobial assay and acute toxicity testing. One-way ANOVA and Dunnett's multiple comparison tests were conducted using GraphPad Prism 8.0 for cytotoxicity assay. Results Methanol extract of Rhus vulgaris showed significant antimicrobial activity against MRSA (12.00 [+ or -] 0.00 mm; p-value of < 0.005; Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of 0.391 mg/ml; Minimum Bactericidal Concentration of 1.563 mg/ml). The extract were not cytotoxic at 100 [mu]g/ml which was the highest tested concentration. In acute dermal irritation testing, the methanol extract resulted in mild irritation with erythema and flaking that cleared within 8 days. There were no observable adverse effects from oral administration of the extracts (acute oral toxicity testing) at concentrations of 50 mg/kg, 300 mg/kg and 2000 mg/kg. Tannins, saponins, flavonoids, terpenoids, glycosides, alkaloids and phenols were detected in the methanol extract. Conclusions Antimicrobial activity of R. vulgaris extracts supports its traditional use as a toothbrush. Cytotoxicity demonstrated by the extracts as well as the mild skin irritation warrants further study before R. vulgaris can be recommended for the development of effective and safe mouthwashes. Keywords: Rhus vulgaris, Antimicrobial, Antifungal, Cytotoxicity, Safety, Acute toxicity, Plant extracts
Author(s): Angela Mutuku[sup.1], Lizzy Mwamburi[sup.1], Lucia Keter[sup.2], Joyce Ondicho[sup.2], Richard Korir[sup.3], James Kuria[sup.2], Timothy Chemweno[sup.1] and Peter Mwitari[sup.2] Background Globally, oral diseases are highly prevalent and pose a major public [...]