학술논문

Impact of circulating tumor DNA mutant allele fraction on prognosis in RAS‐mutant metastatic colorectal cancer
Document Type
Academic Journal
Source
Molecular Oncology. September 2019, Vol. 13 Issue 9, p1827, 9 p.
Subject
Analysis
Development and progression
Prognosis
Cancer treatment -- Analysis
Cancer genetics -- Development and progression -- Prognosis
Cetuximab -- Analysis
Gene mutation -- Analysis
DNA -- Analysis
Colorectal cancer -- Development and progression -- Prognosis
Carcinoembryonic antigen -- Analysis
EDTA -- Analysis
Cancer metastasis -- Prognosis -- Development and progression
Gene mutations -- Analysis
Metastasis -- Prognosis -- Development and progression
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid -- Analysis
Cancer -- Care and treatment -- Genetic aspects
CEA (Oncology) -- Analysis
Language
English
ISSN
1574-7891
Abstract
Abbreviations Introduction The past two decades have witnessed significant progress in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) partly due to a better selection of therapy based on the tumor [...]
Despite major advances in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the survival rate remains very poor. This study aims at exploring the prognostic value of RAS‐mutant allele fraction (MAF) in plasma in mCRC. Forty‐seven plasma samples from 37 RAS‐mutated patients with nonresectable metastases were tested for RAS in circulating tumor DNA using BEAMing before first‐ and/or second‐line treatment. RAS MAF was correlated with several clinical parameters (number of metastatic sites, hepatic volume, carcinoembryonic antigen, CA19‐9 levels, primary site location, and treatment line) and clinical outcome [progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)]. An independent cohort of 32 patients from the CAPRI‐GOIM trial was assessed for clinical outcome based on plasma baseline MAF. RAS MAF analysis at baseline revealed a significant correlation with longer OS [Hazard ratios (HR) = 3.514; P = 0.00066]. Patients with lower MAF also showed a tendency to longer PFS, although not statistically significant. Multivariate analysis showed RAS MAFs as an independent prognostic factor in both OS (HR = 2.73; P = 0.006) and first‐line PFS (HR = 3.74; P = 0.049). Tumor response to treatment in patients with higher MAF was progression disease (P = 0.007). Patients with low MAFs at baseline in the CAPRI‐GOIM group also showed better OS [HR = 3.84; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.5–9.6; P = 0.004] and better PFS (HR = 2.5; 95% CI: 1.07–5.62; P = 0.033). This minimally invasive test may help in adding an independent factor to better estimate outcomes before initiating treatment. Further prospective studies using MAF as a stratification factor could further validate its utility in clinical practice.