학술논문

Organizational level indicators to address health equity work in local public health agencies: a scoping review
Document Type
Report
Source
Canadian Journal of Public Health. Sept-Oct, 2017, Vol. 108 Issue 3, p306, 8 p.
Subject
Canada
Language
English
ISSN
0008-4263
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine what organizational level indicators exist that could be used by local Ontario public health agencies to monitor and guide their progress in addressing health equity. METHOD: This scoping review employed Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) six-stage framework. Multiple online databases and grey literature sources were searched using a comprehensive strategy. Studies were included if they described or used indicators to assess an organization's health equity activity. Abstracted indicator descriptions were classified using the roles for public health action identified by the Canadian National Collaborating Centre for Determinants of Health (NCCDH). Health equity experts participated in a consultation phase to examine items extracted from the literature. SYNTHESIS: Eighteen peer-reviewed studies and 30 grey literature reports were included. Abstracted indicators were considered for 1) relevance for organizational assessment, 2) ability to highlight equity-seeking populations, and 3) potential feasibility for application. Twenty-eight items formed the basis for consultation with 13 selected health equity experts. Items considered for retention were all noted to require significant clarification, definition and development. Those eliminated were often redundant or not an organizational level indicator. CONCLUSION: Few evidence-based, validated indicators to monitor and guide progress to address health inequities at the level of the local public health organization were identified. There is a need for continued development of identified indicator items, including careful operationalization of concepts and establishing clear definitions for key terms. KEY WORDS: Health equity; public health; organization; evaluation; review OBJECTIF : Determiner s'il existe des indicateurs organisationnels dont peuvent se servir les organismes de sante publique locaux de l'Ontario pour surveiller et guider les progres qu'ils accomplissent vers l'equite en sante. METHODE : Pour cette etude de champ, nous avons employe le cadre en six etapes d'Arksey et O'Malley (2005). Nous avons interroge de nombreuses bases de donnees en ligne, ainsi que la litterature grise, a l'aide d'une strategie globale. Ont ete incluses les etudes qui decrivaient ou qui utilisaient des indicateurs pour evaluer les efforts d'organismes sur le plan de l'equite en sante. Des descriptions abregees de ces indicateurs ont ete classifiees selon les roles d'action en sante publique repertories par le Centre de collaboration nationale des determinants de la sante (CCNDS). Des specialistes de l'equite en sante ont participe a une phase de consultation visant a examiner les articles tires de la revue de la litterature. SYNTHESE : Dix-huit etudes evaluees par des pairs et 30 rapports tires de la litterature grise ont ete inclus. Les indicateurs abreges ont ete examines en fonction : 1) de leur pertinence pour l'evaluation organisationnelle, 2) de leur capacite a faire ressortir les populations en quete d'equite et 3) de leur potentiel d'application. Vingt-huit articles ont servi a la consultation avec les 1 3 specialistes de l'equite en sante selectionnes. Nous avons note que tous les articles respectant les criteres de selection avaient besoin d'etre en grande partie eclaircis, definis et developpes. Les articles elimines etaient souvent redondants ou ne portaient pas sur un indicateur organisationnel. CONCLUSION : Nous avons trouve peu d'indicateurs valides et fondes sur des donnees probantes pour surveiller et guider les progres accomplis vers l'equite en sante a l'echelle des organismes de sante publique locaux. Il est necessaire de poursuivre l'elaboration des indicateurs recenses, notamment par une operationnalisation soigneuse des concepts et en definissant clairement les termes cles. MOTS CLES : Equite en sante; sante publique; organisation; evaluation; revue de la litterature
The need to address growing health inequities - those unjust and avoidable differences in health between groups who have varied levels of social privilege related to factors such as wealth, [...]