학술논문

Comparative Efficacy of Transcutaneous Functional Electrical Stimulation With or Without Biofeedback Therapy on Functional Non-retentive Fecal Incontinence in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Original Article
Document Type
Academic Journal
Source
Digestive Diseases and Sciences. March 2022, Vol. 67 Issue 3, p989, 8 p.
Subject
Comparative analysis
Clinical trials -- Comparative analysis
Biofeedback -- Comparative analysis
Fecal incontinence -- Comparative analysis
Medical research -- Comparative analysis
Medicine, Experimental -- Comparative analysis
Biofeedback training -- Comparative analysis
Language
English
ISSN
0163-2116
Abstract
Author(s): Seyedeh-Sanam Ladi-Seyedian [sup.1] [sup.3], Lida Sharifi-Rad [sup.1] [sup.2] [sup.3], Hosein Alimadadi [sup.1] [sup.4], Behnam Nabavizadeh [sup.1], Navid Manouchehri [sup.1] [sup.3], Bahar Allahverdi [sup.1] [sup.4], Farzaneh Motamed [sup.1] [sup.4], Gholam-Hossein [...]
Background We compared the effects of transcutaneous functional electrical stimulation (TFES) and biofeedback therapy with TFES alone in a cohort of children with functional non-retentive fecal incontinence (FNRFI). Methods This prospective, single-center randomized clinical trial was performed on 40 children with FNRFI. Patients were randomly allocated into two equal treatment groups. Group A (n = 20) underwent TFES + biofeedback therapy, and group B (n = 20) received TFES alone. All patients were assessed with a pediatric fecal incontinence (FI) score questionnaire, a visual pain score, and a bowel habit diary both before and at the end of treatment sessions and also at 6 months of follow-up. In addition, a FI quality-of-life (QoL) questionnaire was recorded for all patients before and 6 months after the treatment. Results FI significantly improved in 13/20 (65%) patients in group A and 11/20 (55%) patients in group B (P < 0.05). A significant reduction in FI score was seen in each group at the end of treatment sessions and maintained at 6 months of follow-up (P < 0.05). A significant improvement in FI-QoL scores was seen in both groups at 6 months of follow-up in which there was no significant difference in terms of FI-QoL scores improvement between both groups after treatment. Conclusions The use of electrical stimulation in combination with other treatment methods improves symptoms in patients with FNRFI who are refractory to conventional treatment.