학술논문

A Broken Antibiotic Market: Review of Strategies to Incentivize Drug Development
MAJOR ARTICLE
Document Type
Academic Journal
Source
Open Forum Infectious Diseases. July 2020, Vol. 7 Issue 7
Subject
United States. Food and Drug Administration
United States. Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority
United States. Department of Health and Human Services
Health aspects
Product development
Plazomicin -- Product development
Public-private sector cooperation -- Health aspects
Microbial drug resistance -- Health aspects
Infection -- Health aspects
Tax credits -- Health aspects
Tourism promotion -- Health aspects
Omadacycline -- Product development
Eravacycline -- Product development
Meropenem -- Product development
Vaborbactam -- Product development
Drug resistance in microorganisms -- Health aspects
Travel industry -- Health aspects
Sales promotions -- Health aspects
Language
English
ISSN
2328-8957
Abstract
THE PREVALENCE AND BURDEN OF ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE The threat posed by infections arising from antimicrobial-resistant bacteria and the need for new antimicrobial agents are a global concern as evidenced by [...]
The threat posed by infections arising from antimicrobial-resistant bacteria is a global concern. Despite this trend, the future development of new antimicrobial agents is currently very uncertain. The lack of commercial success for newly launched antimicrobial agents provides little incentive to invest in the development of new agents. To address this crisis, a number of push and pull incentives have been constructed to support antimicrobial drug development. Push incentives, which are designed to lower the cost of developing new antimicrobial agents, include grants, contracts, public-private partnerships, tax credits, and clinical trial networks. Pull incentives, which are designed to facilitate higher financial returns for a newly launched antimicrobial agent, include those that decrease the time for a regulatory review, extend patent exclusivity, or provide premium pricing. Such incentives may also include direct, advanced, or milestone payments or they may be insurance-based whereby healthcare systems pay for the right to access an antimicrobial agent rather than the number of units administered. Another strategy involves the re-evaluation of interpretive criteria for in vitro susceptibility testing (susceptibility breakpoints) of old antimicrobial agents using the same standards applied to those of new agents, which will allow for an accurate determination of antimicrobial resistance. Although each of the above-described strategies will be important to ensure that antimicrobial agents are developed in the decades to come, the update of susceptibility breakpoints for old agents is a strategy that could be implemented quickly and one that could be the most effective for incentivizing drug developers and financiers to reconsider the development of antimicrobial agents. Keywords. antimicrobial drug development; in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility test interpretative criteria; pull incentives; push incentives; susceptibility breakpoints.