학술논문

Significance of the disc damage likelihood scale objectively measured by a non-mydriatic fundus camera in preperimetric glaucoma
Document Type
Report
Source
Clinical Ophthalmology. January 1, 2015, p2147, 11 p.
Subject
Likelihood functions -- Analysis
Glaucoma -- Diagnosis
Tomography -- Usage
Language
English
ISSN
1177-5483
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the correlation between the disc damage likelihood scale (DDLS) objectively measured by a non-mydriatic fundus camera, Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3, and optic coherence tomography in preperimetric glaucoma. Methods: One-hundred-twenty-five patients with preperimetric primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (n=30) were included (mean age 58.9 ± 15.9 years). All three devices graded the optic disc topography: Diagnosis 1 was defined as "outside normal limits", while Diagnosis 2 as "borderline or outside normal limits". Results: For Diagnosis 1, a significant correlation was shown between DDLS and Moorfields regression analysis (P=0.022), and for Diagnosis 2 with glaucoma probability score analysis (P=0.024), in POAG. In pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, DDLS did not correlate significantly with Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 and optic coherence tomography. Regarding the area under the curve the highest predictive power was demonstrated by the objective DDLS (0.513-0.824) compared to Burk (0.239-0.343) and Mikelberg (0.093-0.270) coefficients. Conclusions: The DDLS showed a significant correlation to the Moorfields regression analysis in preperimetric POAG. The objective DDLS showed the highest predictive power and thus is an additive tool in diagnosing preperimetric glaucoma. Keywords: DDLS, preperimetric glaucoma, optic coherence tomography, stereophotography, Heidelberg Retina Tomograph
Introduction To distinguish between preperimetric glaucoma and a variant of the standard optic nerve head (ONH) morphology is probably one of the most difficult decisions in glaucoma diagnostics. (1,2) Therefore, [...]