학술논문

Conservative versus surgical management of prolapse: what dictates patient choice?
Document Type
Clinical report
Source
International Urogynecology Journal. Oct, 2009, Vol. 20 Issue 10, p1157, 5 p.
Subject
Prolapse
Language
English
ISSN
0937-3462
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis The aim of this study is to establish whether the presence of severe symptoms influences women's choice of pessaries or surgery for uterovaginal prolapse. Methods This is a prospective study using the validated Sheffield Prolapse Symptoms Questionnaire. Results Women choosing surgery (n=251) were younger (58 versus 66 years), more bothered by dragging lower abdominal pain (33% versus 25%, P=0.04), need for vaginal digitation (8% versus 3%, P=0.02), and incomplete bowel emptying (27% versus 19%, P=0.01) than women choosing pessaries (n=429). More women opting for surgery were sexually active (51% versus 29%, P Conclusions Nearly two thirds of women with symptomatic prolapse initially opted for conservative management. Women choosing surgery over pessaries for treatment of prolapse describe more severe symptoms related to bowel emptying, sexual function, and quality of life and are bothered by them.