학술논문

Controversies in the Prevention and Treatment of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Adults: A Narrative Review
Document Type
Academic Journal
Source
Microorganisms. February 2023, Vol. 11 Issue 2
Subject
United States. Food and Drug Administration
Metronidazole (Medication)
Diseases
Prevention
Care and treatment
Mortality
Fidaxomicin
Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)
Communicable diseases -- Prevention -- Care and treatment
Metronidazole
Infection -- Care and treatment -- Prevention
Bezlotoxumab
Epidemiology
Drug approval
Antibacterial agents
Adults
Language
English
ISSN
2076-2607
Abstract
Author(s): Taryn B. Bainum [1]; Kelly R. Reveles [2,3]; Ronald G. Hall [1]; Kelli Cornell [1]; Carlos A. Alvarez (corresponding author) [1,4,*] 1. Introduction Clostridioides difficile, formerly known as Clostridium [...]
Clostridioides difficile remains a problematic pathogen resulting in significant morbidity and mortality, especially for high-risk groups that include immunocompromised patients. Both the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (IDSA/SHEA), as well as the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) recently provided guideline updates for C. difficile infection (CDI). In this narrative review, the authors reviewed available literature regarding the prevention or treatment of CDI in adults and focused on disagreements between the IDSA/SHEA and ACG guidelines, as well as articles that have been published since the updates. Several options for primary prophylaxis are available, including probiotics and antibiotics (vancomycin, fidaxomicin). The literature supporting fidaxomicin is currently quite limited. While there are more studies evaluating probiotics and vancomycin, the optimal patient populations and regimens for their use have yet to be defined. While the IDSA/SHEA guidelines discourage metronidazole use for mild CDI episodes, evidence exists that it may remain a reasonable option for these patients. Fidaxomicin has an advantage over vancomycin in reducing recurrences, but its use is limited by cost. Despite this, recent studies suggest fidaxomicin’s cost-effectiveness as a first-line therapy, though this is highly dependent on institutional contracts and payment structures. Secondary prophylaxis should focus on non-antimicrobial options to lessen the impact on the microbiome. The oral option of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), SER109, and the now FDA-approved RBX2660 represent exciting new options to correct dysbiosis. Bezlotoxumab is another attractive option to prevent recurrences. Further head-to-head studies of newer agents will be needed to guide selection of the optimal therapies for CDI primary and secondary prophylaxis.