학술논문
Impact of COVID‐19 on pacemaker implant
Document Type
Report
Author
Source
Journal of Arrhythmia. October 2020, Vol. 36 Issue 5, p845, 4 p.
Subject
Language
English
ISSN
1880-4276
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Since the appearance of the new SARS‐CoV‐2 coronavirus (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) in December 2019, in Wuhan, China; patients were admitted with symptoms of pneumonia, named coronavirus [...]
: Objectives: The purpose of this article was to determine the change in the volume of pacemaker implantations with the COVID‐2019 pandemic and to assess the change in the number of pacemaker implants according to etiology during the pandemic. Background: The establishment of a mandatory social isolation have generated a decrease in activities in cardiology units. Methods: Descriptive, cross‐sectional study that used a database of a Peruvian Hospital. Time was divided into three categories: Before COVID period and COVID period including Previous to Social isolation (SI) and Social Isolation. The number of pacemaker implantations were compared per the same amount of time. Results: A reduction in the pacemaker implant of 73% (95% CI: 33‐113; P Conclusions: Our results indicate a very significant reduction (73%) in de‐novo pacemaker implantation during the months of the COVID‐19 pandemic. The reduction in the number of de‐novo pacemaker occurred independent of the etiology.
: Objectives: The purpose of this article was to determine the change in the volume of pacemaker implantations with the COVID‐2019 pandemic and to assess the change in the number of pacemaker implants according to etiology during the pandemic. Background: The establishment of a mandatory social isolation have generated a decrease in activities in cardiology units. Methods: Descriptive, cross‐sectional study that used a database of a Peruvian Hospital. Time was divided into three categories: Before COVID period and COVID period including Previous to Social isolation (SI) and Social Isolation. The number of pacemaker implantations were compared per the same amount of time. Results: A reduction in the pacemaker implant of 73% (95% CI: 33‐113; P Conclusions: Our results indicate a very significant reduction (73%) in de‐novo pacemaker implantation during the months of the COVID‐19 pandemic. The reduction in the number of de‐novo pacemaker occurred independent of the etiology.