부산대학교 도서관

Objective: To explore patterns in Medicare reimbursement for wasted oncologic and hematologic infusion drugs from 2017 to 2020 and estimate the savings that implementation of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) would have had. Methods: Using the publicly available Medicare Part B Discarded Drug Units database, we analyzed reimbursement data for discarded antineoplastic and hematology therapies from 2017 to 2020. Results: Medicare Part B utilization data was extracted for 77 therapies. From 2017 to 2020, the median annual dollar value of discarded therapies was $590 million. Every year, bortezomib, azacitidine, cabazitaxel, and decitabine were among the most wasted products, an average 24% waste. The IIJA policy would have impacted a median of 20 oncology agents and resulted in median annual refund of $172 million. Had the top five most discarded therapies been redistributed, they could have treated 18,289 patients. The five most wasted drugs were all dosed by weight and distributed in single-use vials. Conclusion: The IIJA could potentially significantly reduce waste or encourage redistribution to treat thousands of additional patients. We propose that a fusion of fixed and weight- based dosing may help reduce wasteful medication administration by offering doses that better accommodate most patients. We anticipate that manufacturers will adapt to the IIJA perhaps by adjusting fixed doses or simply increasing drug prices. If price changes from dose delivery adjustment occur, rebates offered to pharmacy benefit managers and insurers will likely follow suit and may alter formulary positioning.
The annual spending on medications associated with cancer care worldwide exceeds $ 185 billion US dollars. (1) Domestically, this category of medications is the second largest in sales and is [...]