학술논문

No Evidence for Ceftobiprole-Induced Immune Hemolytic Anemia in Three Phase 3 Clinical Trials
Document Type
Clinical report
Source
Infection and Drug Resistance. September 30, 2020, Vol. 13, p3209, 7 p.
Subject
Clinical trials
Staphylococcus aureus infections -- Complications and side effects
Hospital patients
Daptomycin -- Complications and side effects
Child health
Respiratory system agents -- Complications and side effects
Pneumonia -- Complications and side effects
Hemolytic anemia -- Complications and side effects
Cephalosporins -- Complications and side effects
Methicillin -- Product development -- Complications and side effects
Language
English
ISSN
1178-6973
Abstract
Purpose: Drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia (DIIHA) is a rare but serious adverse event associated with a number of drugs, including second- and third-generation cephalosporins. A positive direct antiglobulin test (DAT) is a reliable finding in DIIHA, but positive results without evidence of hemolysis can occur, particularly in hospitalized patients. There have been no reports of hemolytic anemia in four previous Phase 3 trials or from postmarketing surveillance of the advanced-generation, broad-spectrum cephalosporin, ceftobiprole. The aim of this analysis was to review the incidence of positive DAT results and any evidence of hemolytic anemia from three recent Phase 3 trials of ceftobiprole. Patients and Methods: Patients were enrolled in three Phase 3 randomized controlled trials: 94 pediatric patients with pneumonia received ceftobiprole in the BPR-PIP-002 trial; 335 adults with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections received ceftobiprole in the TARGET trial; and 201 adults with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia have been randomized 1:1 to ceftobiprole or daptomycin [+ or -] aztreonam in the ongoing ERADICATE trial. In all three trials, DAT results were obtained at baseline, and follow-up tests were performed either at the test of cure (TOC) visit (BPR-PIP-002), end-of-treatment (EOT) visit (TARGET), or both EOT and post-treatment Day 70 visits (ERADICATE). Results: In the BPR-PIP-002 trial, five patients (all ceftobiprole treated) had a documented negative DAT result at baseline followed by a positive result at the TOC visit. One patient in the ongoing, blinded ERADICATE trial had a positive DAT result at both baseline and EOT. Results from other laboratory investigations showed no evidence of hemolytic anemia in these patients. No positive DAT results were reported in the TARGET trial. Conclusion: No evidence of hemolytic anemia associated with ceftobiprole was observed in either adults or children across several indications in this analysis of three large Phase 3 trials. Keywords: DIIHA, direct antiglobulin test, hemolysis, pneumonia, ABSSSIs, Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia
Plain Language Summary Drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia is an extremely rare form of anemia. It occurs when red blood cells are destroyed by the immune system in response to treatment [...]