학술논문

Large cryptic genomic rearrangements with apparently normal karyotypes detected by array-CGH
Document Type
Academic Journal
Source
Molecular Cytogenetics. November 19, 2014, Vol. 7
Subject
United States
Language
English
ISSN
1755-8166
Abstract
Background Conventional karyotyping (550 bands resolution) is able to identify chromosomal aberrations >5-10 Mb, which represent a known cause of intellectual disability/developmental delay (ID/DD) and/or multiple congenital anomalies (MCA). Array-Comparative Genomic Hybridization (array-CGH) has increased the diagnostic yield of 15-20%. Results In a cohort of 700 ID/DD cases with or without MCA, including 15 prenatal diagnoses, we identified a subgroup of seven patients with a normal karyotype and a large complex rearrangement detected by array-CGH (at least 6, and up to 18 Mb). FISH analysis could be performed on six cases and showed that rearrangements were translocation derivatives, indistinguishable from a normal karyotype as they involved a similar band pattern and size. Five were inherited from a parent with a balanced translocation, whereas two were apparently de novo. Genes spanning the rearrangements could be associated with some phenotypic features in three cases (case 3: DOCK8; case 4: GATA3, AKR1C4; case 6: AS/PWS deletion, CHRNA7), and in two, likely disease genes were present (case 5: NR2F2, TP63, IGF1R; case 7: CDON). Three of our cases were prenatal diagnoses with an apparently normal karyotype. Conclusions Large complex rearrangements of up to 18 Mb, involving chromosomal regions with similar size and band appearance may be overlooked by conventional karyotyping. Array-CGH allows a precise chromosomal diagnosis and recurrence risk definition, further confirming this analysis as a first tier approach to clarify molecular bases of ID/DD and/or MCA. In prenatal tests, array-CGH is confirmed as an important tool to avoid false negative results due to karyotype intrinsic limit of detection. Keywords: GTG-banding, Array-CGH, Unbalanced derivative chromosomes, CNV, Genomic rearrangement, Intellectual disability
Author(s): Eleonora Di Gregorio[sup.1,2] , Elisa Savin[sup.2] , Elisa Biamino[sup.3] , Elga Fabia Belligni[sup.3] , Valeria Giorgia Naretto[sup.2] , Gaetana D'Alessandro[sup.2] , Giorgia Gai[sup.2] , Franco Fiocchi[sup.2] , Alessandro Calcia[sup.1] [...]