학술논문

Stapled versus Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: is there any evidence-based information?
Document Type
Report
Source
International Journal of Colorectal Disease. Sept, 2008, Vol. 23 Issue 9, p825, 8 p.
Subject
Language
English
ISSN
0179-1958
Abstract
Aims The objective of this study was to compare the perioperative, short-term, and long-term outcomes of stapled hemorrhoidectomy with Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy. Materials and methods The present meta-analysis pooled the effects of outcomes of a total 926 patients treated with stapled or Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy in five out of 122 screened for retrieval randomized controlled trials using the fixed-effects or a random-effects model. Results Stapled hemorroidectomy was equivalent to the Ferguson procedure in comparisons pertaining to the following outcomes: hospital stay, postoperative hemorrhage requiring intervention, early postoperative bleeding Conclusions There is convincingly apparent evidence about the safety and efficacy of stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the comparison with the well-established Ferguson procedure.