학술논문
The relationship between mandibular advancement, tongue movement, and treatment outcome in obstructive sleep apnea
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Document Type
Report
Author
Source
SLEEP. June 2022, Vol. 45 Issue 6, p1L, 11 p.
Subject
Language
English
ISSN
0161-8105
Abstract
Introduction Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is an increasingly common sleep disorder [1,2]. A narrow airway, impaired muscle responsiveness, low arousal threshold, and unstable ventilatory control contribute to disease severity [3,4]. [...]
Study Objectives: To characterize how mandibular advancement enlarges the upper airway via posterior tongue advancement in people with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and whether this is associated with mandibular advancement splint (MAS) treatment outcome. Methods: One-hundred and one untreated people with OSA underwent a 3T magnetic resonance (MRI) scan. Dynamic mid-sagittal posterior tongue and mandible movements during passive jaw advancement were measured with tagged MRI. Upper airway cross-sectional areas were measured with the mandible in a neutral position and advanced to 70% of maximum advancement. Treatment outcome was determined after a minimum of 9 weeks of therapy. Results: Seventy-one participants completed the study: 33 were responders (AHI50% AHI reduction), 11 were partial responders (>50% AHI reduction but AHI>10 events/hr), and 27 nonresponders (AHI reduction4 mm). In comparison, a model using only baseline AHI correctly classified 50.0% of patients (5-fold cross-validated 52.5%, n = 40). Conclusions: Tongue advancement and upper airway enlargement with mandibular advancement in conjunction with baseline AHI improve treatment response categorization to a satisfactory level (69.2%, 5-fold cross-validated 62.5%). Key words: mandibular advancement splint; obstructive sleep apnea; magnetic resonance imaging; tagged MRI; upper airway mechanics; MAS treatment prediction
Study Objectives: To characterize how mandibular advancement enlarges the upper airway via posterior tongue advancement in people with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and whether this is associated with mandibular advancement splint (MAS) treatment outcome. Methods: One-hundred and one untreated people with OSA underwent a 3T magnetic resonance (MRI) scan. Dynamic mid-sagittal posterior tongue and mandible movements during passive jaw advancement were measured with tagged MRI. Upper airway cross-sectional areas were measured with the mandible in a neutral position and advanced to 70% of maximum advancement. Treatment outcome was determined after a minimum of 9 weeks of therapy. Results: Seventy-one participants completed the study: 33 were responders (AHI50% AHI reduction), 11 were partial responders (>50% AHI reduction but AHI>10 events/hr), and 27 nonresponders (AHI reduction4 mm). In comparison, a model using only baseline AHI correctly classified 50.0% of patients (5-fold cross-validated 52.5%, n = 40). Conclusions: Tongue advancement and upper airway enlargement with mandibular advancement in conjunction with baseline AHI improve treatment response categorization to a satisfactory level (69.2%, 5-fold cross-validated 62.5%). Key words: mandibular advancement splint; obstructive sleep apnea; magnetic resonance imaging; tagged MRI; upper airway mechanics; MAS treatment prediction