학술논문
Use of Auto-Injector for Methotrexate Subcutaneous Self-Injections: High Satisfaction Level and Good Compliance in SELF-I Study, a Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel Group Study
Original Research
Original Research
Document Type
Report
Author
Saraux, Alain; Hudry, Christophe; Zinovieva, Elena; Herman-Demars, Hélène; Aouadi, Lahouari; Arif, Azzedine; Arty-Hue, Heyliette; Banal, Frederic; Baron, Jean-Jacques; Basch, Andre; Berton, Valerie; Bitar, Salma; Cantagrel, Alain; Cayla, Pierre; Combe, Bernard; Cornaille-Lafage; Duplantier, Dominique
Source
Rheumatology and Therapy. March 2019, Vol. 6 Issue 1, p47, 14 p.
Subject
Language
English
Abstract
Author(s): Alain Saraux [sup.1] [sup.2] , Christophe Hudry [sup.3] , Elena Zinovieva [sup.4] , Hélène Herman-Demars [sup.4] , Lahouari Aouadi, Azzedine Arif, Heyliette Arty-Hue, Frederic Banal, Christopher Banse, Jean-Jacques Baron, [...]
Introduction The objective of the study was to compare compliance and acceptability of a new auto-injector (AI) versus syringe for administration of methotrexate (MTX) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods We conducted a randomized, open-label, parallel group study comparing AI to pre-filled syringe (PFS). Adult patients with RA (ACR/EULAR 2010) receiving MTX (orally or by injection) for at least 3 months were allocated to AI or PFS for 6 months and then were allocated to AI for 6 further months. Two co-primary endpoints were defined at M6: percentage of patients with compliance at least 80%; change in functional capacity assessed by Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). Secondary endpoints included quality of life (RaQoL), RA activity (DAS28), and acceptability. Local safety at injection site was assessed at each visit. Results Two-hundred and sixty-five patients were randomized. The main analysis was conducted on per protocol set (99 AI and 98 PFS). Compliance was 96.2% in AI and 98.9% in PFS. Good complier rates were 89.9% and 94.9%, thus a difference of - 5.0% (- 18.9%; 8.9%). HAQ remained stable in both groups. No difference was found on RaQoL, change in RA activity, and safety profile. Autonomy, acceptability, and patient satisfaction were better with AI, and patients having had the experience of both AI and PFS preferred AI (p < 0.001). Conclusions Although this study did not demonstrate non-inferiority of AI versus PFS, compliance was excellent in the two groups, and AI, which was preferred by patients, is a valuable alternative to PFS for administration of MTX. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02553018. Funding Nordic Pharma SAS.
Introduction The objective of the study was to compare compliance and acceptability of a new auto-injector (AI) versus syringe for administration of methotrexate (MTX) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods We conducted a randomized, open-label, parallel group study comparing AI to pre-filled syringe (PFS). Adult patients with RA (ACR/EULAR 2010) receiving MTX (orally or by injection) for at least 3 months were allocated to AI or PFS for 6 months and then were allocated to AI for 6 further months. Two co-primary endpoints were defined at M6: percentage of patients with compliance at least 80%; change in functional capacity assessed by Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). Secondary endpoints included quality of life (RaQoL), RA activity (DAS28), and acceptability. Local safety at injection site was assessed at each visit. Results Two-hundred and sixty-five patients were randomized. The main analysis was conducted on per protocol set (99 AI and 98 PFS). Compliance was 96.2% in AI and 98.9% in PFS. Good complier rates were 89.9% and 94.9%, thus a difference of - 5.0% (- 18.9%; 8.9%). HAQ remained stable in both groups. No difference was found on RaQoL, change in RA activity, and safety profile. Autonomy, acceptability, and patient satisfaction were better with AI, and patients having had the experience of both AI and PFS preferred AI (p < 0.001). Conclusions Although this study did not demonstrate non-inferiority of AI versus PFS, compliance was excellent in the two groups, and AI, which was preferred by patients, is a valuable alternative to PFS for administration of MTX. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02553018. Funding Nordic Pharma SAS.