학술논문

A black swan in a sea of white noise: using technology-enhanced learning to afford educational inclusivity for learners with Asperger's Syndrome
Document Type
Text
Source
Social Inclusion, 3(6)
Subject
Bildung und Erziehung
Publizistische Medien, Journalismus,Verlagswesen
Bildungswesen tertiärer Bereich
Lehrende, Erziehende, Lernende
Unterricht, Didaktik
interpersonelle Kommunikation
interaktive, elektronische Medien
Autismus
Lernen
computervermittelte Kommunikation
kooperatives Lernen
Technologie
Hochschule
Student
Education
News media, journalism, publishing
University Education
Teachers, Students, Pupils
Curriculum, Teaching, Didactics
Interpersonal Communication
Interactive, electronic Media
autism
learning
computer-mediated communication
cooperative learning
technology
university
student
Language
English
Abstract
Against a backdrop of increasingly vocation-focussed course provision within higher education, of widening participation initiatives intended to promote greater inclusion for learners affected by learning difficulties, and of moves towards greater use of social and collaborative forms of learning, this paper discusses the case of an undergraduate Computing student affected by Asperger's Syndrome (AS).While there is recognition in the literature of problems associated with face-to-face dialogue for persons affected by AS, there is a paucity of research both into the experience of students in higher education, and around the issue of participation in group-work activities increasingly found in creative aspects of computing. This paper highlights a tension between moves towards collaborative learning and UK disabilities legislation in relation to learners with AS. Employing a qualitative case-study methodology, the investigation revealed how a technology-enhanced learning intervention afforded an AS-diagnosed learner greater opportunities to participate in group-work in a higher education context. The findings suggest that not only can computer-mediated communications afford AS-diagnosed learners opportunities to participate meaningfully in group-work, but also that the learner demonstrated higher levels of collective-inclusive versus individual-exclusive phraseology than neurotypical peers, thereby challenging assumptions around participation in collaborative learning activities and assimilation of peer-feedback.