학술논문

试论瑕疵担保责任在中国《合同法》上的定位
Research on orientation of the guarantee liability about blemish in Chinese < contract law >
시론하자단보책임재중국《합동법》상적정위
Document Type
Article
Text
Author
Source
중국법연구, 06/30/2013, Vol. 19, p. 81-100
Subject
결손담보책임
위약책임
귀책원칙
엄중한 책임
무과실책임
the guarantee liability about blemish the liability for breach contract criterion of liability strict liability liability without fault
瑕疵担保责任
违约责任
归责原则
严格责任
无过错责任
Language
Chinese
ISSN
1738-7051
Abstract
瑕疵担保责任是大陆法系国家民法在买卖合同中所确立的一项独立的民事责 任,后来引申适用于除劳动合同以外的其他有偿合同。当代大陆法系主流民法理论虽然仍承认瑕疵担保责任有 自己的一定特性,但不再将其定位为独立的民 事责任,而是将其作为债务不履行责任的一种。在中国《合同法》上,关于瑕 疵担保责任是否为一项独立的民事责任的问题,法学界主要有肯定说、否定说 和折中说三种观点。笔者基本赞同否定说,瑕疵担保责任在中国《合同法》上并非一项独立的民事责任,而是 属于违约责任范畴中的一项相对独立的民事责任,只是其归责原则是无过错责任原则而非《合同法》上违约责 任的基本归 责原则—严格责任而已。
According to the civil law of continental law countries.,the guarantee liability about blemish is an independent civil liability which,prescribed by the Article of sale contract,is also applied to other onerous contract except employment contract. It is acknowledged that the guarantee liability about blemish has its own characteristic,with reference to contemporary theory of civil law’s mainstream in continental law countries. However,such‘liability’is a kind of default rather than the independent one beyond any scopes. In Chinese , there are arguments about weather the guarantee liability about blemish is an independent civil liability,from which the following three kinds of viewpoints are concluded:the independent liability、not independent liability or the compromise. Fundamentally,the author support that the guarantee liability about blemish is not independent liability. Pursuant to Chinese , the guarantee liability about blemish is not an totally independent civil liability.Furthermore,it is a relatively independent liability which belongs to the liability for the breach of contract only. Its criterion of liability is liability without fault rather than strict liability, which is the basic criterion of liability for breach of contract.of .