부산대학교 도서관

Security Act has been partially revised many times since it was revised to ｢Security Service Act｣. Main contents of such revision consist of the addition of security work such as protection or special security, responsibility enforcement of security company or security guard and systematic management of security service based on security work of previous security service act. But, it needs to be checked out that the fundamental matter about the concept of ‘security’ is directly related as double-edged sword in such flow of legal revision. That is because security service satisfies the multiple needs for security in the modern risky society and is based on the concept of active management whose goal is to forster and develop the function of actual security service comparing that current ｢Security Service Act｣ regulates the formal security service whose goal is permission of security service and systematic management based on article 2 as previous facilities and manned security that is guard duty-centered security service in another respect. So, this study pointed out the limit of interpreting security and security service in ｢Security Services Industry Act｣ in respect of providing private security service and drew the conclusion that the legislation and efforts are required for ‘security for citizen’ by reinterpreting the legislation and revision of private security service-related law as the normal regulation of ｢Security Services Industry Act｣ and the special law of ｢Private Security Services Industry Act｣.