학술논문

朝鮮刊 『選賦抄評注解刪補』引 『楚辭』 各篇之考實
Textual Criticism of Xuanfu Chaoping Pizhu Shanbu Quotedfrom Chuci and Printed in Chosun Era
조선간 『선부초평주해산보』인 『초사』 각편지고실
Document Type
Article
Text
Author
Source
열상고전연구, 12/31/2016, Vol. 54, p. 395-417
Subject
『선부초평주해산보』
관판본
방각본
『초사집주』
양상림간본
Xuanfu Chaoping Pizhu Shanbu
official edition
folk edition
Yang Shanglin’s Chuci Jizhu
Language
Korean
ISSN
1738-2734
Abstract
Xuanfu Chaoping Pizhu Shanbu(Deleting and Adding Commentary of Selected Works) which was circulated in Chosun era included three versions, namely written edition, offical edition and folk printed edition. This was a process of recarving, deleting and adding up for various versions, ranging from being written by hands, locally printed in official houses to being printed in the folk houses. Xuanfu Chaoping Pizhu Shanbu, mainly on fu (descriptive prose interspersed with verse) from Wenxuan (selected proses), added other proses outside Wenxuan. The official edition only selected one prose, namly Lisao Jing from Chuci, while the folk house printed edition added Jiuge Jiuzhang, and Tianwen from Chuci. The version of Xuanfu(Selected Works)was not the same as Chuci,but both official and folk printed versions identifies Lisao Jing, Jiuge, Jiuzhang, Tianwen as a piece of fu (descriptive prose interspersed with verse). Besides, Xuanfu(Selected Works), whose explanatory notes were completely based on Zhuxi’s Chuci Jizhu, was likely to be deleted and added up according to Yang Shanglin’s Chuci Jizhu reprinted in Chosun era. The explanatory notes of various chapters of Chuci in Xuanfu Chaoping Pizhu Shanbu was reasonably deleted and changed, sometimes mistakenly removed. However, compared with Jiuge, Jiuzhang and Tianwen of folk printed edition, Lisao Jing of official edition contained much less commentary errors. In addition, Lisao Jing of official edition was not deleted, collated and phonetically notated in such a large quantity in every chapter as Chuci of folk printed edition. Therefore, Xuanfu Chaoping Pizhu Shanbu had important literature value not only in exploring the acceptance of Lisao Jing, Jiuge, Jiuzhang and Tianwen in Chosun era, but also in canonizing Zhuxi’s annotation.