학술논문

환경소양 요인별 수준에 따른 환경행동 실천 경험의 차이
Differences in Environmental Behavior Practice Experience according to the Level of Environmental Literacy Factors
Document Type
Article
Text
Source
대한지구과학교육학회지, 04/30/2023, Vol. 16, Issue 1, p. 153-165
Subject
환경소양
환경소양 요인
환경행동
환경행동실천
environmental literacy
environmental literacy factors
environmental behavior
environmental behavior practice
Language
Korean
ISSN
2005-5668
Abstract
This study investigates learners' environmental literacy, classifies the results by factors of environmental literacy, and then investigates the differences in the students' environmental behavior practice experiences according to the classification by factor. The study was conducted with 47 6th grade students from D elementary school located in P metropolitan city as the subject of final analysis, and environmental literacy questionnaires and environmental behavior practice experience questionnaires were used as the main data. As a result of the study, the learners were classified into three groups according to the factors of environmental literacy, and they were respectively named as the “High environmental literacy group”, “low environmental literacy group”, and “Low Function and Affectif group”. A Word network was formed using the descriptions of environmental behavior practice experiences for each cluster, and a Degree Centrality Analysis was performed to visualize and then analyze. As a result of the analysis, “High environmental literacy group” was confirmed, 1) recognized the subjects of environmental action practice as individuals and families, 2) described his experience of environmental action practice in relation to all elements of environmental literacy, and had a relatively pessimistic view. “low environmental literacy group”, and “Low Function and Affectif group” were confirmed 1) perceive the subject of environmental behavior practice as a relatively social problem, 2) the description of the experience of environmental behavior practice is relatively biased specific factors, and the “Low Function and Affectif group” is particularly focused on the knowledge element. And 3) it was confirmed that they were aware of climate change from a relatively optimistic perspective. Based on this conclusion, suggestions were made from the perspective of environmental education.