학술논문

Self-determination theory and customer revenge behavior: explaining how customers regulate their anger and revenge behavior
Document Type
JOURNAL
Source
Journal of Consumer Marketing, 2024, Vol. 41, Issue 2, pp. 129-147.
Subject
research-article
Research paper
cat-MARK
Marketing
cat-MRCB
Market research/consumer behaviour
Self-determination theory
Orientation of motivation
Autonomy
Relatedness
Competence
Negative motive
Anger
Desire for revenge
Direct revenge behavior
Indirect revenge behavior
Autonomous motivation
Controlled motivation
Language
English
ISSN
0736-3761
Abstract
Purpose This study aims to explore and empirically examine an integrative model of the customer revenge process by linking two well-established theories of self-determination theory (SDT) and appraisal theory. Design/methodology/approach A survey of 901 respondents, followed by a post-hoc survey of 712 individuals, was conducted to examine the autonomous versus controlled orientations for revenge motivation. Findings The results show that customers’ orientation of motivation (OM) can regulate their revenge behavior (direct versus indirect) in case of service failures. Specifically, the interaction of OM components (i.e. autonomy, relatedness and competence) can play a significant role in the relationship between revenge predictors and revenge behavior. Implications for research and practice are discussed. Originality/value This paper offers a novel conceptual framework to explain the moderating effects of OM on the relationship between revenge predictors and revenge behavior. This study extends the application of SDT to the context of customer anger and revenge.