학술논문

Research data sharing behaviour of engineering researchers in Norway and the UK: uncovering the double face of Janus
Document Type
Journal
Source
Journal of Documentation, 2020, Vol. 77, Issue 2, pp. 576-593.
Subject
research-article
Research paper
cat-LISC
Library & information science
cat-RMP
Records management & preservation
cat-DOCM
Document management
cat-CCAT
Classification & cataloguing
cat-IBRT
Information behaviour & retrieval
cat-CBM
Collection building & management
cat-SCPG
Scholarly communications/publishing
cat-IKM
Information & knowledge management
cat-IMG
Information management & governance
cat-IMAN
Information management
cat-ICT
Information & communications technology
cat-INT
Internet
Research data sharing
Open research data
Institutional logics
Engineering
Institutional complexity
Language
English
ISSN
0022-0418
Abstract
PurposeIn a context of growing policy pressures to increase the societal impact of Higher Education Institutions (HEI), open access to research data has gained increased significance, in spite of the limited availability of standard procedures and protocols, particularly in the engineering disciplines. In this article, we explore how engineering researchers' engagement with such external environment pressures impacts the conventional dimensions of engineering research work, and how engineering researchers within engineering HEI resolve potential tensions and make sense of their research data sharing practices.Design/methodology/approachWe use an institutional logics theoretical perspective to qualitatively examine research data sharing behaviours of researchers in Norway and the UK as leading engineering research centres, through the use of policy analysis and narrative interviews.FindingsThe findings indicate that research data sharing behaviours are heavily mediated by institutional rules and rationalities that inform researchers' attitudes, but the logics that prize openness and sharing co-exist with logics that favour control and self-interest.Originality/valueOur findings suggest that logics-specific variations in engineering researchers' identities and goals are of paramount importance to policymakers, research funders and academic leaders striving to support HEI in their efforts to augment the societal impact of research.