학술논문

Do board interlocks support monitoring effectiveness? : Evidence from listed German companies
Document Type
JOURNAL
Source
Management Research Review, 2019, Vol. 42, Issue 11, pp. 1278-1296.
Subject
research-article
Research paper
cat-MSOP
Management science & operations
Multiple directorships
Board interlocks
Corporate governance
Supervisor board
Monitoring effectiveness
Management compensation
Pay-for-performance
CEO turnover
Language
English
ISSN
2040-8269
Abstract
Purpose This paper aims to investigate the relationship between board interlocks and monitoring effectiveness for listed German companies in a context of risk governance. While agency-theory and resource-dependence-theory suggest a positive association between board interlocks and monitoring effectiveness, reasons such as limited temporal resources of busy board members may suggest a negative association. Design/methodology/approach By using panel data regression, the authors examined the association between board interlocks and monitoring effectiveness, which was approximated by excessive management compensation, pay-for-performance-sensitivity and CEO turnover-performance-sensitivity. The data set comprises 3,998 directorships for 132 listed German companies covering the period 2015-2017. Findings The authors find that board interlocks are associated with not only a more excessive management pay and less performance-sensitive turnover but also a higher pay-for-performance-sensitivity. Originality/value The study examines the impact of multiple directorships based on a German panel data set that includes both multiple appointments of members to national supervisory boards and all other appointments to national and international executive and supervisory bodies. The authors compile three measures to operationalize monitoring effectiveness.