학술논문

Monopole Design for Superdirectivity with Pattern Radiation Reconfigurable
Document Type
Conference
Source
2018 IEEE Conference on Antenna Measurements & Applications (CAMA) Antenna Measurements & Applications (CAMA), 2018 IEEE Conference on. :1-4 Sep, 2018
Subject
Aerospace
Bioengineering
Communication, Networking and Broadcast Technologies
Components, Circuits, Devices and Systems
Computing and Processing
Fields, Waves and Electromagnetics
General Topics for Engineers
Geoscience
Antenna arrays
Impedance
Directive antennas
Antenna radiation patterns
Mathematical model
Mutual coupling
Superdirectivity
end-fire
impedance-matched
impedance active.
Language
Abstract
This paper presents a global study for superdirectivity of an array of 2 monopoles antennas. It is principally based on Uzkov’s theory, who define the possibility to obtain a high directivity in order of $N^{2}$ in a desired direction by linearly associating a large number N of radiators closely spaced. A first study is made by exciting monopoles by specific currents excitation in magnitude and phase to obtain a superdirectivity reconfigurable in a desired direction. Secondly, to reduce until eliminate mutual coupling between monopoles, we excite one of monopole by a & [1]. However, the most significant works for a large number of associating radiators is from I.Uzkov [2], who states in 1946 the possibility to make a superdirectivity, meaning a directivity in order of $N^{2}$, by linearly associating a larger number N of closely spaced radiating elements. Then, he showed from equations (1) and (2) defined below that this directivity can be in a desired direction $(\theta ,\varphi )$ when radiating elements are properly excited. unit current and loaded the other one by an impedance determined from uzkov’s theory. Simulator Ansys HFSS is used to calculated impedance matrix $H_{mn}$ of monopoles antennas array and then currents excitation coefficients $a_{{0} {n}}$ used after to determine impedance $Z_{load}$. Simulations show approximately similar results in the 2 cases with a reconfigurable directivity a least in around of $8 . 5 dB$ in a desired direction.