학술논문

Model-Based Estimation of Inspiratory Effort Using Surface EMG
Document Type
Periodical
Source
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on. 70(1):247-258 Jan, 2023
Subject
Bioengineering
Computing and Processing
Components, Circuits, Devices and Systems
Communication, Networking and Broadcast Technologies
Electromyography
Ventilation
Muscles
Estimation
Pressure measurement
Lung
Channel estimation
lung mechanics
mechanical ventilation
non-invasive parameter estimation
system identification
Language
ISSN
0018-9294
1558-2531
Abstract
Objective: The quantification of inspiratory patient effort in assisted mechanical ventilation is essential for the adjustment of ventilatory assistance and for assessing patient-ventilator interaction. The inspiratory effort is usually measured via the respiratory muscle pressure ( P $_{\mathsf{mus}}$) derived from esophageal pressure ( P $_{\mathsf{es}}$) measurements. As yet, no reliable non-invasive and unobtrusive alternatives exist to continuously quantify P $_{\mathsf{mus}}$. Methods: We propose a model-based approach to estimate P $_{\mathsf{mus}}$ non-invasively during assisted ventilation using surface electromyographic (sEMG) measurements. The method combines the sEMG and ventilator signals to determine the lung elastance and resistance as well as the neuromechanical coupling of the respiratory muscles via a novel regression technique. Using the equation of motion, an estimate for P $_{\mathsf{mus}}$ can then be calculated directly from the lung mechanical parameters and the pneumatic ventilator signals. Results: The method was applied to data recorded from a total of 43 ventilated patients and validated against P $_{\mathsf{es}}$-derived P $_{\mathsf{mus}}$. Patient effort was quantified via the P $_{\mathsf{mus}}$ pressure-time-product (PTP). The sEMG-derived PTP estimated using the proposed method was highly correlated to P $_{\mathsf{es}}$-derived PTP ($\mathsf{r}=\text{0.95}\pm \text{0.04}$), and the breath-wise deviation between the two quantities was $-\text{0.83}\pm \text{1.73}\,\text{cmH}_\text{2}\text{O}\text{s}$. Conclusion: The estimated, sEMG-derived P $_{\mathsf{mus}}$ is closely related to the P $_{\mathsf{es}}$-based reference and allows to reliably quantify inspiratory effort. Significance: The proposed technique provides a valuable tool for physicians to assess patients undergoing assisted mechanical ventilation and, thus, may support clinical decision making.