학술논문

Reduced Effort Does Not Imply Slacking: Responsiveness to Error Increases With Robotic Assistance
Document Type
Periodical
Source
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, IEEE Transactions on. 26(7):1363-1370 Jul, 2018
Subject
Bioengineering
Computing and Processing
Robotics and Control Systems
Signal Processing and Analysis
Communication, Networking and Broadcast Technologies
Task analysis
Force
Target tracking
Force measurement
Robot sensing systems
Monitoring
Robotic assistance
slacking
motor adaptation
isometric training
Language
ISSN
1534-4320
1558-0210
Abstract
In both neurorehabilitation and functional augmentation, the patient or the user’s muscular effort diminishes when the movement of their limb is supported by a robot. Is this relaxation a result of “slacking” by letting the robot take-over the movement, resulting in less responsiveness in the task? To address this question, we tested subjects who controlled a virtual cursor isometrically to track a moving target without and with different assistants. We measured the force applied by the subject as a metric for effort and estimated their control gain as the metric for responsiveness in the task. Although subjects applied less force with position assistance, the norm of the control gain increased with all assistants, i.e., they applied proportionately larger forces for the same difference between the cursor and the target states. Furthermore, assisting velocity errors improved baseline performance without reducing effort. Though all assistants improved task performance, the control gain adapted differently to position and velocity assistance. Position assistance was exploited to accurately track the target, whereas velocity assistance was treated as a disturbance, and was effectively nullified as it prevented submovements that minimized positional error. Our results show that robotic assistance increases task responsiveness in healthy individuals and that assisting velocity errors could boost patient performance without reducing their motor effort.