학술논문

Evaluating Transitive Perceptual Effects Between Virtual Entities in Outdoor Augmented Reality
Document Type
Conference
Source
2024 IEEE Conference Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR) VR Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR), 2024 IEEE Conference. :619-629 Mar, 2024
Subject
Computing and Processing
Meters
Dinosaurs
Three-dimensional displays
Head-mounted displays
Animals
Affordances
Estimation
Human-centered computing
Human computer interaction
Human computer interaction (HCI) Interaction paradigms
Mixed / augmented reality
Language
ISSN
2642-5254
Abstract
Augmented reality (AR) head-mounted displays (HMDs) provide users with a view in which digital content is blended spatially with the outside world. However, one critical issue faced with such display technologies is misperception, i.e., perceptions of computer-generated content that differs from our human perception of other real-world objects or entities. Misperception can lead to mistrust in these systems and negative impacts in a variety of application fields. Although there is a considerable amount of research investigating either size, distance, or speed misperception in AR, far less is known about the relationships between these aspects. In this paper, we present an outdoor AR experiment (N = 20) using a HoloLens 2 HMD. Participants estimated size, distance, and speed of Familiar and Unfamiliar outdoor animals at three distances (30, 60, 90 meters). To investigate whether providing information about one aspect may influence another, we divided our experiment into three phases. In Phase I, participants estimated the three aspects without any provided information. In Phase II, participants were given accurate size information, then asked to estimate distance and speed. In Phase III, participants were given accurate distance and size information, then asked to estimate speed. Our results show that estimates of speed in particular of the Unfamiliar animals benefited from provided size information, while speed estimates of all animals benefited from provided distance information. We found no support for the assumption that distance estimates benefited from provided size information.