학술논문

MLNet: Metaheuristics-Based Lightweight Deep Learning Network for Cervical Cancer Diagnosis
Document Type
Periodical
Source
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. Biomedical and Health Informatics, IEEE Journal of. 27(10):5004-5014 Oct, 2023
Subject
Bioengineering
Communication, Networking and Broadcast Technologies
Components, Circuits, Devices and Systems
Computing and Processing
Signal Processing and Analysis
Feature extraction
Convolutional neural networks
Computational modeling
Computer architecture
Deep learning
Microprocessors
Cervical cancer
deep learning
diagnosis
dynamically hybrid niching differential evolution
lightweight deep learning network
metaheuristics
particle swarm optimization
Language
ISSN
2168-2194
2168-2208
Abstract
One of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths among women is cervical cancer. Early diagnosis and treatment can minimize the complications of this cancer. Recently, researchers have designed and implemented many deep learning-based automated cervical cancer diagnosis models. However, the majority of these models suffer from over-fitting, parameter tuning, and gradient vanishing problems. To overcome these problems, in this paper a metaheuristics-based lightweight deep learning network (MLNet) is proposed. Initially, the hyper-parameters tuning problem of convolutional neural network (CNN) is defined as a multi-objective problem. Particle swarm optimization (PSO) is used to optimally define the CNN architecture. Thereafter, Dynamically hybrid niching differential evolution (DHDE) is utilized to optimize the hyper-parameters of CNN layers. Each particle of PSO and solution of DHDE together represent the possible CNN configuration. F-score is used as a fitness function. The proposed MLNet is trained and validated on three benchmark cervical cancer datasets. On the Herlev dataset, MLNet outperforms the existing models in terms of accuracy, f-measure, sensitivity, specificity, and precision by 1.6254%, 1.5178%, 1.5780%, 1.7145%, and 1.4890%, respectively. Also, on the SIPaKMeD dataset, MLNet achieves better performance than the existing models in terms of accuracy, f-measure, sensitivity, specificity, and precision by 2.1250%, 2.2455%, 1.9074%, 1.9258%, and 1.8975%, respectively. Finally, on the Mendeley LBC dataset, MLNet achieves better performance than the competitive models in terms of accuracy, f-measure, sensitivity, specificity, and precision by 1.4680%, 1.5845%, 1.3582%, 1.3926%, and 1.4125%, respectively.