학술논문

Deep Learning-Based Measurement of Total Plaque Area in B-Mode Ultrasound Images
Document Type
Periodical
Source
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. Biomedical and Health Informatics, IEEE Journal of. 25(8):2967-2977 Aug, 2021
Subject
Bioengineering
Communication, Networking and Broadcast Technologies
Components, Circuits, Devices and Systems
Computing and Processing
Signal Processing and Analysis
Image segmentation
Ultrasonic imaging
Manuals
Training
Ultrasonic variables measurement
Atherosclerosis
Area measurement
Carotid atherosclerosis
carotid ultrasound
deep learning
segmentation
total plaque area
Language
ISSN
2168-2194
2168-2208
Abstract
Measurement of total-plaque-area (TPA) is important for determining long term risk for stroke and monitoring carotid plaque progression. Since delineation of carotid plaques is required, a deep learning method can provide automatic plaque segmentations and TPA measurements; however, it requires large datasets and manual annotations for training with unknown performance on new datasets. A UNet++ ensemble algorithm was proposed to segment plaques from 2D carotid ultrasound images, trained on three small datasets (n = 33, 33, 34 subjects) and tested on 44 subjects from the SPARC dataset (n = 144, London, Canada). The ensemble was also trained on the entire SPARC dataset and tested with a different dataset (n = 497, Zhongnan Hospital, China). Algorithm and manual segmentations were compared using Dice-similarity-coefficient (DSC), and TPAs were compared using the difference ($\Delta$TPA), Pearson correlation coefficient ( r ) and Bland-Altman analyses. Segmentation variability was determined using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient-of-variation (CoV). For 44 SPARC subjects, algorithm DSC was 83.3–85.7%, and algorithm TPAs were strongly correlated ( r = 0.985–0.988; p < 0.001) with manual results with marginal biases (0.73–6.75) mm$^2$ using the three training datasets. Algorithm ICC for TPAs (ICC = 0.996) was similar to intra- and inter-observer manual results (ICC = 0.977, 0.995). Algorithm CoV = 6.98% for plaque areas was smaller than the inter-observer manual CoV (7.54%). For the Zhongnan dataset, DSC was 88.6% algorithm and manual TPAs were strongly correlated ( r = 0.972, p < 0.001) with $\Delta$TPA = −0.44$\pm$4.05 mm$^2$ and ICC = 0.985. The proposed algorithm trained on small datasets and segmented a different dataset without retraining with accuracy and precision that may be useful clinically and for research.