학술논문

Accuracy of Nearshore Bathymetry Inverted From ${X}$ -Band Radar and Optical Video Data
Document Type
Periodical
Source
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on. 55(2):1106-1116 Feb, 2017
Subject
Geoscience
Signal Processing and Analysis
Radar imaging
Laser radar
Optical imaging
Optical sensors
Sea measurements
Engines
radar imaging
remote sensing
sea coast
sea floor
signal processing
Language
ISSN
0196-2892
1558-0644
Abstract
Shore-based remote sensing platforms are increasingly used to frequently (~daily) obtain bathymetric information of large (~km $^{2}$ ) nearshore regions over many years. With recorded wave frequency $\Omega $ and wavenumber $k$ (and hence wave phase speed $c = \Omega /k$ ), bed elevation $z_{b}$ can be derived using a model that relates $\Omega $ and $k$ to water depth. However, the accuracy of $z_{b}$ as a function of the sensor and the method of $\Omega -k$ retrieval is not well known, especially not under low-period waves. Here, we assess the accuracy of $z_{b}$ , based on two sensors with their own method of phase speed retrieval, in a dynamic, kilometer-scale environment (Sand Engine, The Netherlands). Bias in $z_{b}$ is systematic. A fast Fourier transform (FFT) method on ${X}$ -band radar imagery produced $z_{b}$ too shallow by 1.0 m for $-15~\text {m} \leq z_{b} \leq -9$ m, and too deep by 2.3 m for $z_{b}\geq -6$ m. A cross-spectral method on optical video imagery produced $z_{b}$ too shallow by 0.59 m for $-10~\text {m} \leq z_{b} \leq -5$ m, and too deep by 0.92 m for $z_{b}\geq -1$ m. Intermediate depths had negligible bias, −0.02 m for the radar-FFT approach and −0.01 m for the video-CS approach. The collapse of the FFT method in shallow water may be explained by the inhomogeneity of the wave field in the 960 m $\times960$ m analysis windows. A shoreward limit of the FFT method is proposed that depends on $z_{b}$ in the analysis windows.