학술논문

Broadband access: comparing alternatives
Document Type
Periodical
Author
Source
IEEE Communications Magazine IEEE Commun. Mag. Communications Magazine, IEEE. 33(8):34-46 Aug, 1995
Subject
Power, Energy and Industry Applications
Signal Processing and Analysis
Computing and Processing
Communication, Networking and Broadcast Technologies
Telephony
Cable TV
Companies
Investments
Hybrid fiber coaxial cables
Satellite broadcasting
Coaxial components
Digital modulation
Communication cables
Baseband
Language
ISSN
0163-6804
1558-1896
Abstract
Capital investments by network providers to develop broadband access for the information superhighway have inherent risks. Nevertheless, potential rewards to telephone companies, cable TV companies, and others for serving the end consumer in an expanding information economy make such investments a business imperative. This article focuses on the incumbent terrestrial access providers, the telephone local exchange carriers (LECs) and cable multiple system operators (MSOs). First, it cites the business environment and the information highway services that are driving local telephone and cable companies to invest in broadband access, as evolving technology and relaxing regulation enable the convergence of these two industries. Broadband access technologies are then reviewed and evolutionary paths from the respective embedded bases are considered, with respect to both today's choices and the long-term vision. The two choices for broadband access are loosely termed hybrid fiber-coax (HFC) and switched digital video (SDV). The thrust of this article is to explain why these two alternatives overshadow all others and to highlight the decision factors facing network providers in choosing between them.ETX